Data Analysis How Much Does Raydium Really Rely on pump.fun?
Original Title: "Data Analysis: How Dependent Is Raydium on pump.fun?"
Original Author: Azuma, Odaily Planet Daily
The mainstream DEX protocol on Solana, Raydium (RAY), experienced a sharp decline today, directly triggered by pump.fun seemingly testing its own AMM liquidity pool. The market speculates that this move may lead to future pump.fun ecosystem tokens not being pooled on Raydium after breaking out of the "seed round," but instead being directly diverted to the pump.fun protocol, resulting in a reduction in Raydium's trading volume, corresponding revenue, and buyback amount.
Logic Behind RAY's Decline (Readers familiar with the relevant logic can skip this section)
Let's briefly outline the relationship between Raydium and pump.fun.
As the current leading meme token launchpad platform on Solana, the issuance of pump.fun's token goes through two stages: "seed round" and "public round." After the token is issued, it will first enter the "seed round" trading phase, which relies on pump.fun's protocol's own Bonding Curve for matching transactions. When the trading volume reaches $69,000, it will then enter the "public round" trading phase, at which point liquidity will migrate to Raydium, where a pool will be created and trading will continue.
Next, let's look at Raydium and RAY.
Currently, Raydium charges a 0.25% fee per transaction, with 0.22% allocated to Raydium's liquidity providers (LP) and 0.03% used for RAY buyback and ecosystem support. In summary, Raydium's trading volume will indirectly affect RAY's price through fee revenue.
So the current situation is that if pump.fun builds its own AMM, liquidity will no longer migrate to Raydium in the future, thereby reducing the latter's trading volume, fees, and consequently affecting RAY's value performance.
How Dependent Is Raydium on pump.fun?
Today, there has already been a lot of analysis in the market on the above points. However, it seems that no one has carefully examined how much Raydium relies on pump.fun in terms of trading volume. Therefore, we queried some data sources on Defillama and Dune, and the conclusion is shown in the following figure.

As can be seen from the above chart, in the past 14 weeks, the trading volume of the pump.fun token on Raydium has generally accounted for around 20%. This means that if pump.fun does indeed redirect trading volume from Raydium in the future through its own AMM (excluding autonomous liquidity migration activities due to uncertain platform fee rate differences), Raydium is expected to experience around a 20% reduction in trading volume.
Oversold?
Turning back to the market situation, OKX data shows that RAY dropped to a low of $2.82 today, corresponding to a decrease of over 30% (the data was delayed, but in hindsight, there was indeed some overselling at that time). The current price has gradually recovered to $3.15, representing a 25.43% decrease.
Considering that SOL also experienced a 5.8% decrease, RAY's current decline is basically within a reasonable range, meaning that the market has preemptively priced in pump.fun's frontrunning behavior.
Let's end with a quote from Fluid COO DMH:
“RAY's plummet once again proves to us that ‘distribution >>> tech.’ Both the traditional world (Microsoft) and the crypto space (Metamask) have countless examples showing that if you have a large enough user base, your product isn't that important.”
関連記事

BVNK創設者:ステーブルコインの発展の三つの段階

トランプの次男のビットコインゲームの真実:自分は1億ドルを稼ぎ、個人投資家は5億ドルの大損をした

可組合RWAの台頭

MegaETH のローンチにより FDV が 20 億ドルを突破しましたが、どのエコシステムプロジェクトに注目すべきでしょうか?

対話「木頭姐」キャシー・ウッド:次のブルマーケットが間もなく到来する

予測市場は永続契約の競争に勝てるのでしょうか?

一体誰が Trade.xyz で取引をしているのですか?

バイナンスが静かに大手モデル会社に賭けた

Stripe Sessions 2026:AIエージェント、グローバル決済と見えない暗号インフラ

韓国の暗号税制はどこへ向かうのか?

伝説の投資家ナヴァル:Appleは死んだ、SaaSもその後を追う、起業家には18ヶ月で競争優位を再構築する時間がある

早報 | VisaがPolygonをグローバルステーブルコイン決済プランに組み入れ;MoonPayが1億ドルでセキュリティ会社Sodotを買収;デジタルウォレットプラットフォームBeloが1400万ドルのAラウンド資金調達を完了

連邦準備制度理事会の決議全文:3回連続で動かず、しかし意見の対立が激化

但斌が手を出し、ポジションを構築する Circle

世界の80の主要な決済機関とウォレットを分析する

Polymarket 取引戦略の検証報告:20以上の方向性の中で、「生き残った」のは4つだけ

DeFi貸付の不可能な二角

