Make Income Great Again

By: blockbeats|2025/03/12 07:45:02
Share
copy
Article Author: Decentralised.Co
Article Translation: Block Unicorn

Make Income Great Again

This article is inspired by a series of conversations with Ganesh Swami, covering the seasonality of revenue, the evolution of business models, and whether token buybacks are the best use of protocol capital. This is a complement to my previous article on the crypto stagnation.

The private capital markets, such as venture capital, oscillate between liquidity abundance and scarcity. When these assets become liquid and external capital flows in, market frenzy drives up prices. Think of a newly launched IPO or token issuance. Newly found liquidity exposes investors to more risk, which in turn fuels the birth of a new generation of companies. As asset prices rise, investors seek to reallocate funds into early-stage applications, hoping to achieve higher returns than benchmarks like ETH and SOL. This is a feature, not a bug.

The liquidity of cryptocurrency follows a cyclical pattern similar to Bitcoin halving. Historically, market rebounds have occurred within six months after Bitcoin halving. In 2024, ETF inflows and Saylor's purchases acted as Bitcoin absorbers. Saylor alone spent $22.1 billion last year acquiring Bitcoin. However, last year's surge in Bitcoin price did not translate into a resurgence of small-cap altcoins.

We are witnessing an era where capital allocators face liquidity crunches, attention is scattered across thousands of assets, and founders who have been toiling on tokens for years struggle to find meaning in it. Why bother building real applications when launching meme assets can yield more financial returns? In previous cycles, L2 tokens enjoyed a premium due to listings on trading platforms and venture capital support, driven by perceived value. But as more participants flood the market, this perception (and its valuation premium) is dissipating.

As a result, L2 tokens have seen their valuations decrease, limiting their ability to subsidize small products through grants or token-based revenue. This valuation excess in turn forces founders to pose an age-old question that plagues all economic activities—where does revenue come from?

So Transactional

The diagram above illustrates the typical operation of cryptocurrency revenue. For most products, the ideal state is akin to AAVE and Uniswap. Thanks to the Lindy Effect or first-mover advantage, these two products have maintained fees for years. Uniswap can even increase front-end fees and generate revenue. This demonstrates the level of consumer preference definition. Uniswap to decentralized exchanges is like Google to search.

In contrast, friendtech and OpenSea have seasonal revenue. During the NFT summer, the market cycle lasted for two quarters, while social finance speculation only lasted for two months. If the scale of revenue is significant and aligned with the product's intent, the speculative revenue of the product makes sense. Many Meme trading platforms have joined the over $1 billion fee club. The scale of this number is what most founders can expect at best through tokens or acquisition. However, for most founders, this kind of success is rare. They are not building consumer apps; they focus on infrastructure, where the revenue dynamics are different.

Between 2018 and 2021, venture capital heavily funded developer tools, hoping developers would attract a large number of users. However, by 2024, the ecosystem underwent two significant changes. First, smart contracts achieved infinite scalability with limited human intervention. Uniswap or OpenSea do not need to scale their teams in proportion to transaction volume. Secondly, advancements in LLM and AI reduced the investment demand for cryptocurrency developer tools. Therefore, as a category, it is at a reckoning moment.

In Web2, the API-based subscription model was effective due to the massive online user base. However, Web3 is a smaller niche market, with few apps extending to millions of users. Our advantage is the high-income per user metric. Cryptocurrency's average user tends to spend more money more frequently because blockchain enables you to do so—it makes the flow of funds possible. Therefore, over the next 18 months, most businesses will have to redesign their business models to directly derive revenue in the form of transaction fees from users.

This is not a new concept. Stripe initially charged per API call, Shopify charged fixed fees for subscriptions, and later both shifted to revenue-based fees. For infrastructure providers, this transition in Web3 is quite straightforward. They will eat into the market by competitively pricing in the API arena—perhaps even offering products for free until a certain transaction volume, followed by revenue-sharing negotiations. This is the idealized scenario.

What will this look like in practice? One example is Polymarket. Currently, the UMA protocol's token is used for dispute resolution, with the token tied to disputes. The more markets there are, the higher the probability of disputes occurring. This drives demand for the UMA token. In the transaction model, the required collateral can be a small fraction of the total wager, such as 0.10%. For instance, a $1 billion wager on a presidential election result would bring $1 million in revenue to UMA. Under the assumed scenario, UMA can use this revenue to buy back and burn their tokens. This approach has its benefits and challenges, which we will soon see.

Another participant engaging in such activity is MetaMask. The transaction volume handled through its embedded swap feature is approximately $360 billion. The exchange revenue alone surpasses $3 billion. A similar pattern applies to staking providers like Luganode, where fees are based on the staked asset amount.

But in a market where API call costs are increasingly decreasing, why would developers choose one infrastructure provider over another? If revenue sharing is a requirement, why would one choose an oracle over another? The answer lies in network effects. A data provider that supports multiple blockchains, offers unparalleled data granularity, and can index data from new chains faster will become the preferred choice for new products. The same logic applies to transaction categories such as intent-driven or gasless exchanges. The more chains supported, the lower the profit margin, the faster the speed, the higher the likelihood of attracting new products, as this marginal efficiency helps retain users.

Complete Destruction

The shift to align token value with protocol revenue is not new. In recent weeks, several teams have announced mechanisms to buy back or burn tokens in proportion to revenue. Notable among these are SkyEcosystem, Ronin Network, Jito SOL, Kaito AI, and Gearbox Protocol. Token buyback is similar to stock buyback in the U.S. stock market—it is essentially a way to return value to shareholders (or in this case, token holders) without violating securities laws. In 2024, there were about $790 billion allocated to stock buybacks in the U.S. market alone, compared to $170 billion in 2000. Whether these trends will continue remains to be seen, but we observe a clear market divide between tokens with cash flow willing to invest in their own value and those with neither.

For most early protocols or dApps, using revenue to buy back their own tokens may not be the best use of capital. One way to carry out such an operation is to allocate enough capital to offset the dilution brought about by newly issued tokens. This is the approach the founder of Kaito recently explained about their token buyback method. Kaito is a centralized entity using tokens to incentivize its user base. The company receives centralized cash flow from its corporate clients. They use a portion of the cash flow to execute buybacks through market makers. The quantity purchased is twice the number of newly issued tokens, effectively making the network deflationary.

Ronin, on the other hand, takes a different approach. The blockchain adjusts fees based on the transaction volume per block. During peak usage periods, a portion of the network fees goes into Ronin's treasury. This is a method to control asset supply without necessarily buying back the token itself. In both these cases, founders have designed mechanisms to align value with network economic activity.

In future articles, we will delve into the impact of these operations on the price and on-chain behavior of tokens participating in such activities. However, it is currently evident that as valuations are being suppressed and the amount of venture capital flowing into cryptocurrency diminishes, more teams will have to compete for the marginal funds flowing into our ecosystem. Given that blockchain is fundamentally a money lego, most teams will pivot to a fee-based model proportional to transaction volume. In such a scenario, if a team is tokenized, they will be incentivized to implement a buyback and burn model. Teams executing well on this front will emerge as winners in the liquidity market.

Of course, one day, all these discussions about price, earnings, and revenue will become irrelevant. We will once again spend money on dog pictures and purchase monkey NFTs. However, when I look at the current state of the market, most founder concerns around survival have shifted towards discussions on revenue and burning.

Original Article Link

You may also like

a16z Leads $18M Seed Round for Catena Labs, Crypto Industry Bets on Stablecoin AI Payment

Traditional finance is still stuck in a "human-to-human" model, while Catena aims to achieve "AI-to-AI" interaction.

Pharos, deeply integrated with AntChain, is about to launch. How can we get involved?

What is the relationship between the $8 million funded NewChain and Ant, and how will they interact?

$COIN Joins S&P 500, but Coinbase Isn't Celebrating

On May 13, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that Coinbase would officially replace Discover Financial Services in the S&P 500 on May 19. While other companies like Block and MicroStrategy, closely tied to Bitcoin, were already part of the S&P 500, Coinbase became the first cryptocurrency exchange whose primary business is in the index. This also signifies that cryptocurrency is gradually moving from the fringes to the mainstream in the U.S.



On the day of the announcement, Coinbase's stock price surged by 23%, surpassing the $250 mark. However, just 3 days later, Coinbase was hit by two consecutive events: a hack where employees were bribed to steal customer data and a demand for a $20 million ransom, and an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the authenticity of its claim of having over 100 million "verified users" in its securities filings and marketing materials. These two events acted as mini-bombs, and at the time of writing, Coinbase's stock had already dropped by over 7.3%.


Coincidentally, Discover Financial Services, being replaced by Coinbase, can also be considered the "Coinbase" of the previous payment era. Discover is a U.S.-based digital banking and payment services company headquartered in Illinois, founded in 1960. Its payment network, Discover Network, is the fourth largest payment network apart from Visa, Mastercard, and American Express.


In April, after the approval of the acquisition of Discover by the sixth-largest U.S. bank, Capital One, this well-established digital banking company of over 60 years smoothly handed over its S&P 500 "seat" to this emerging cryptocurrency "bank." This unexpected coincidence also portrayed the handover between the new and old eras in Coinbase's entry into the S&P 500, resembling a relay race scene. However, this relay baton also brought Coinbase's accumulated "external troubles and internal strife" to a tipping point.


Side Effects of ETFs


Over the past decade, cryptocurrency exchanges have been the most stable "profit machines." They play a role in providing liquidity to the entire industry and rely on trading fees to sustain their operations. However, with the comprehensive rollout of ETF products in the U.S. market, this profit model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the leader in the "American stack," with over 80% of its business coming from the U.S., Coinbase is most affected by this.



Starting from the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, traditional financial capital has significantly onboarded users and funds that originally belonged to exchanges in a more cost-effective, compliant, and transparent manner. The transaction fee revenue of cryptocurrency exchanges has started to decline, and this trend may further intensify in the coming months.


According to Coinbase's 2024 Q4 financial report, the platform's total trading revenue was $417 million, a 45% year-on-year decrease. The contribution of BTC and ETH's trading revenue dropped from 65% in the same period last year to less than 50%.


This decline is not a result of a decrease in market enthusiasm. In fact, since the approval of the Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the inflow of BTC into the U.S. market has continued to reach new highs, with asset management giants like BlackRock and Fidelity rapidly expanding their management scale. Data shows that BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) alone has surpassed $17 billion in assets under management. As of mid-May 2025, the cumulative net inflow of 11 major institutional Bitcoin spot ETFs on the market has exceeded $41.5 billion, with a total net asset value of $1214.69 billion, accounting for approximately 5.91% of the total Bitcoin market capitalization.


Chart showing the trend of net outflows for Grayscale among the 11 institutions


Institutional investors and some retail investors are shifting towards ETF products, partly due to compliance and tax considerations. On one hand, ETFs have much lower trading costs compared to cryptocurrency exchanges. While Coinbase's spot trading fee rate varies annually in a tiered manner but averages around 1.49%, for example, the management fee for IBIT ETF is only 0.25%, and the majority of ETF institution fees fluctuate around 0.15% to 0.25%.



In other words, the more rational users are, the more likely they are to move from exchanges to ETF products, especially for investors aiming for long-term holdings.


According to multiple sources, several institutions, including VanEck and Grayscale, have submitted applications to the SEC for a Solana (SOL) ETF, with some institutions also planning to submit an XRP ETF proposal. Once approved, this may trigger a new round of fund migration. According to a report submitted by Coinbase to the SEC, as of April, the platform's trading revenue from XRP and Solana accounted for 18% and 10%, nearly one-third of the platform's fee revenue.



However, the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs passed in 2024 also reduced the fees for these two tokens on Coinbase from 30% and 15% to 26% and 10%, respectively. If the SOL and XRP ETFs are approved, it will further undermine the core fee revenue of exchanges like Coinbase.


The expansion of ETF products is gradually weakening the financial intermediary status of cryptocurrency exchanges. From their original roles as matchmakers and clearers to now gradually becoming mere "on-ramps and off-ramps" for funds, exchanges are seeing their marginal value squeezed by ETFs.


Robinhood Takes a Stand, Traditional Brokerages Join the Fray


On May 12, 2025, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins gave a keynote speech at the Tokenization and Cryptocurrency Working Group roundtable. The theme of his speech revolved around "It is a new day at the SEC," where he indicated that the SEC would not approach enforcement and regulation the same way as before but would instead pave the way for cryptocurrency assets in the U.S. market.



With signs of cryptocurrency compliance such as the SEC's "NEW DAY" declaration, an increasing number of traditional brokerages are attempting to enter the cryptocurrency industry. One of the most representative cases is the well-known U.S. brokerage Robinhood, which began expanding its crypto business in 2018. By the time of its IPO in 2021, Robinhood's crypto business revenue accounted for over 50% of the company, with a significant boost from the Dogecoin "moonshot" promoted by Musk.


In Q1 2025 earnings report, Robinhood showcased strong growth, especially in revenue from cryptocurrency and options trading. Fueled by Trump's Memecoin, cryptocurrency-related revenue reached $250 million, nearly doubling year-over-year. Consequently, Robinhood Gold subscription users reached 3.5 million, a 90% increase from the previous year, with the rapid growth of Robinhood Gold providing the company with a stable source of income.



Meanwhile, RobinHood is actively pursuing acquisitions in the cryptocurrency space. In 2024, it announced a $2 billion acquisition of the long-standing European cryptocurrency exchange Bitstamp. Additionally, Canada's largest cryptocurrency CEX, WonderFi, which recently went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also announced its integration with RobinHood Crypto. After obtaining virtual asset licenses in the UK, Canada, Singapore, and other markets, RobinHood has taken a proactive approach in the compliant cryptocurrency trading market.



Furthermore, an increasing number of brokerage firms are exploring the same path. Futu Securities, Tiger Brokers, and others are also dipping their toes into cryptocurrency trading, with some having applied for or obtained the VA license from the Hong Kong SFC. Although their user bases are currently small, traditional brokerages have a natural advantage in user trust, regulatory licenses, and low fee structures. This could pose a threat to native cryptocurrency platforms in the future.



User Data Breach: Is Coinbase Still Secure?


In April 2025, security researchers discovered that some Coinbase user data was leaked on the dark web. While the platform initially responded by attributing it to a "technical misinformation," it still raised concerns among users regarding its security and privacy protection. Just two days before Dow Jones Indexes announced Coinbase's addition to the S&P 500 Index, on May 11, 2025, Coinbase received an email from an unknown threat actor claiming to have obtained customer account information and internal documents, demanding a $20 million ransom to keep the data private. Subsequent investigations confirmed the data breach.


Cybercriminals obtained the data by bribing overseas customer service agents and support staff, mainly in "non-U.S. regions such as India." These agents abused their access to Coinbase's internal customer support system and stole customer data. As early as February this year, blockchain detective ZachXBT revealed on X platform that between December 2024 and January 2025, Coinbase users lost over $65 million to social engineering scams, with the actual amount potentially higher.


Among the victims was a well-known figure, 67-year-old Ed Suman, an established artist in the art world for nearly two decades, having been involved in the creation of artworks such as Jeff Koons' "Balloon Dog" sculpture. Earlier this year, he fell victim to an impersonation scam involving fake Coinbase customer support, resulting in a loss of over $2 million in cryptocurrency. ZachXBT critiqued Coinbase for its inadequate handling of such scams, noting that other major exchanges have not faced similar issues and recommending Coinbase to enhance its security measures.


Amidst a series of ongoing social engineering incidents, although there has not been any impact on user assets at the technical level so far, it has raised concerns among many retail and institutional investors. Especially institutions holding massive assets on Coinbase. Just considering the U.S. BTC ETF institutions, as of mid-May 2025, they collectively hold nearly 840,000 BTC, and 75% of these are custodied by Coinbase. If we price BTC at $100,000, this amount reaches a staggering $63 billion, which is equivalent to the nominal GDP of two Iceland in the year 2024.


Visualization: ChatGPT, Source: Farside


In addition, Coinbase Custody also serves over 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, family offices, pension funds, and endowments. As of the Q1 2025 financial report, Coinbase's total assets under management (including institutional and retail clients) reached $404 billion. The specific amount of institutional custodied assets was not explicitly disclosed in the latest report, but it should still be over 50% based on the Q4 2024 report.


Visualization: ChatGPT


Once this security barrier is breached, not only could the rate of user attrition far exceed expectations, but more importantly, institutional trust in it would undermine the foundation of its business. Therefore, after a hacking event, Coinbase's stock price plummeted significantly.


CEXs are All in Self-Rescue Mode


Facing a decline in spot trading fee revenue, Coinbase is also accelerating its transformation, attempting to find growth opportunities in derivatives and emerging assets. Coinbase acquired a stake in the options platform Deribit at the end of 2024 and announced the official launch of perpetual contract products in 2025. This acquisition fills in Coinbase's gap in options trading and its relatively small global market share.



Deribit has a strong presence in non-U.S. markets, especially in Asia and Europe. The acquisition has enabled Coinbase to gain a dominant position in bitcoin and ethereum options trading on Deribit, accounting for approximately 80% of the global options trading volume, with daily trading volume remaining above $2 billion.


Meanwhile, 80-90% of Deribit's customer base consists of institutional investors, with their professionalism and liquidity in the Bitcoin and Ethereum options market highly favored by institutions. Coinbase's compliance advantage, coupled with its already robust institutional ecosystem, makes it even more suitable. By using institutions as an entry point, it can face the squeeze from giants like Binance and OKX in the derivatives market.



Facing a similar dilemma is Kraken, which is attempting to replicate Binance Futures' model in non-U.S. markets. Since the derivatives market relies more on professional users, fee rates are relatively higher and stickiness is stronger, making it a significant source of revenue for exchanges. In the first half of 2025, Kraken completed the acquisition of TradeStation Crypto and a futures exchange, aiming to build a complete derivatives trading ecosystem to hedge the risk of declining spot transaction fee income.


With the surge of Memecoin in 2024, Binance, OKX, and various CEX platforms began massively listing small-market-cap, highly volatile tokens to activate active trading users. Due to the wealth effect and trading activity of Memecoins, Coinbase was also forced to join the battle, successively listing popular tokens from the Solana ecosystem such as BOOK OF MEME and Dogwifhat. Although these coins are controversial, they are frequently traded, with fee rates several times higher than mainstream coins, serving as a "blood-boosting" method for spot trading.


However, due to its status as a publicly traded company, this practice is a riskier endeavor for Coinbase. Even in the current crypto-friendly environment, the SEC is still investigating whether tokens like SOL, ADA, and SAND constitute securities.


In addition to the forced transformation strategies carried out by the aforementioned CEXs, they are also starting to lay out RWAs and the most talked-about stablecoin payment fields, such as the PYUSD launched through a collaboration between Coinbase and Paypal, Coinbase's support for the Euro stablecoin EURC by Circle that complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements, or the USD1 launched through a collaboration between Binance and WIFL. In the increasingly crowded trading field, many CEXs have shifted their focus from just the trading market to the application field.


The golden age of transaction fees has quietly ended, and the second half of the crypto exchange platform game has silently begun.


Arthur Hayes: Why I'm Betting on ETH While the Market Is Obsessed with SOL

"I personally have also allocated 20% to gold, expecting the price of gold to potentially rise to $10,000-20,000 by the end of this market cycle."

CryptoPunks Changes Hands Twice, Did the Originator of NFTs Finally Find Its "Forever Home" This Time?

The original NFT pioneer CryptoPunks has once again officially changed ownership after being sold to the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) developer Yuga Labs.

The End and Rebirth of NFTs: How the Meme Coin Craze Ended the PFP Era?

There must be another Labubu hidden beneath the ruins.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more