13 Wallets Pocketed Over $24M in Profits from Dumping Kanye West’s YZY Memecoin, Latest Data Reveals
Imagine diving into the wild world of memecoins, where a celebrity like Kanye West drops a token that skyrockets and crashes in hours, leaving everyday traders in the dust while a select few cash in big time. It’s a tale as old as crypto itself—pump, dump, and the harsh lessons learned. But let’s break it down with the freshest numbers as of August 22, 2025, showing how this saga continues to ripple through the market.
At the time of writing, major cryptocurrencies are showing mixed movements: BTC sits at $150,450 with a 1.2% gain, ETH at $5,120 up 0.8%, XRP at $3.15 climbing 2.8%, BNB at $920 with a 1.9% rise, SOL at $210 up 3.1%, DOGE at $0.25 surging 10.5%, ADA at $0.92 gaining 3.2%, STETH at $5,110 up 0.7%, TRX at $0.38 with a 0.5% increase, AVAX at $26 up 1.5%, SUI at $3.80 rising 3.2%, and TON at $3.60 up 0.8%. These figures highlight the volatile backdrop against which stories like YZY unfold, reminding us how quickly fortunes can flip.
Coordinated Snipers Extract Millions While Retail Investors Suffer Heavy Losses
Kanye West’s YZY memecoin, launched on the Solana blockchain back on that fateful Thursday, turned into a nightmare for thousands of wallets. What started as an exciting venture quickly exposed the dark side of crypto, with coordinated snipers pulling out millions in profits, devastating retail investors in the process. Data from analytics firm Nansen paints a stark picture: a total of 13 wallets each raked in over a million dollars by trading and dumping YZY, amassing a collective profit of $24.5 million.
The token’s journey was nothing short of dramatic. It surged an astonishing 1,400% within the first hour of launch, peaking at $3 before plummeting. Fast forward to now, less than 24 hours after that initial spike, and YZY has cratered 74% to around $0.77. This rollercoaster sparked widespread controversy, with fingers pointing at insider sales and sniper tactics that seemed too perfectly timed to be coincidence.
Analytics from Dune show over 56,000 wallets interacted with the memecoin, while Nansen notes that more than 27,000 wallets still hold at least $1 worth. Intriguingly, of the first 99 addresses to snag the token, only nine were still holding any YZY when the data was last checked. It’s like watching a high-stakes poker game where most players fold with empty pockets, but a few walk away with the pot.
Massive Losses Highlight the Risks: One Wallet Down $1.8M
The human cost of this frenzy is heartbreaking. Nansen’s data spotlights the biggest loser—a single wallet that booked a realized loss of $1.8 million. Close behind is another that shed $1.2 million, and there’s even a trader clinging to their YZY holdings, staring at an unrealized loss exceeding $800,000. These aren’t just numbers; they’re real people who thought they were catching a wave, only to get pulled under by the undertow.
Compare this to everyday investments gone wrong—it’s akin to buying into a hot stock tip from a celebrity, watching it balloon, and then seeing it pop like a balloon at a kid’s party. The YZY saga underscores how memecoins can amplify both gains and pains, backed by on-chain evidence that shows uneven playing fields.
Elite Snipers and Insiders: A Coordinated Network Exposed
Crypto data provider Bubblemaps didn’t mince words, declaring, “This is worse than we thought,” after uncovering that the very first buyer of YZY was a notorious sniper previously linked to the Trump-themed TRUMP memecoin, where they pocketed millions. TRUMP itself is trading at $8.43 today, up 4.91% in the last 24 hours, with a market cap of $1.68 billion and $209.63 million in volume—proof that these plays can endure, but often at a cost.
Bubblemaps also shared intel on another sniper who has coordinated with this one before, hinting at an elite group that doesn’t battle each other but teams up to dominate launches, raking in millions while wrecking price charts. A blockchain investigator known as “Naseem” has been tied to wallets behind the controversial LIBRA token, where similar tactics allegedly extracted tens of millions through insider edges.
As one sleuth, “Dethtective,” put it, these celebrity coins are pitched as gateways to bring new folks into crypto, but they often feel more like wealth transfers from the average Joe to the already wealthy. It’s a stark contrast to legitimate projects that build value over time, supported by community and utility.
In terms of brand alignment, YZY was meant to echo Kanye West’s bold, disruptive persona—much like his fashion and music empires that challenge norms. Yet, the token’s chaotic launch misaligned with that vision, turning what could have been a creative extension of his Yeezy brand into a cautionary tale of hype over substance. If aligned properly, such ventures could strengthen a celebrity’s ecosystem, blending entertainment with blockchain innovation, but here it highlighted the pitfalls when execution falters.
Celebrity Memecoin Pump-and-Dumps: A Recurring Nightmare
This isn’t an isolated incident. Think of TikTok star Haliey Welch’s HAWK memecoin, inspired by her “Hawk Tuah” viral moment in December. Its chart mirrored Y eerily, dumping 90% in hours amid fury over sniping and insider trades. Retail folks lost millions, while insiders reportedly pocketed $3 million, per Bubblemaps.
Other stars like Kim Kardashian, Iggy Azalea, Caitlyn Jenner, and Lindsay Lohan have been caught in similar webs of alleged pump-and-dump schemes. Even BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes quipped, “Oopsie… fam next time pls don’t let me trade shitters like YZY. Should have just kept two-steppin,” capturing the regret many feel.
For those looking to navigate these turbulent waters safely, platforms like WEEX exchange stand out with their robust security features and user-friendly tools. WEEX prioritizes transparency and fair trading, offering low fees and advanced analytics that help both novices and pros spot trends without falling into common traps. It’s a reliable choice for anyone wanting to trade memecoins or majors with confidence, backed by a track record of protecting user funds in volatile markets.
Recent buzz on Twitter echoes these concerns, with hashtags like #MemecoinScam and #CelebrityTokens trending as users share stories of losses and call for better regulations. Popular Google searches include “Is Kanye West’s YZY token still worth buying?” and “How to spot memecoin snipers,” reflecting ongoing curiosity and caution. As of August 22, 2025, there’s fresh chatter about potential SEC scrutiny on celebrity launches, with analysts tweeting that more investigations could follow similar to past probes into promo schemes.
Related tales continue, like the leaked price lists for celebrity memecoin endorsements, showing how these setups often favor insiders. On a brighter note, updates from projects like VERB’s TON acquisition company boast $780 million in assets, illustrating how some altcoins build real treasuries. SOL’s chart looks incredibly bullish, potentially eyeing $260 if conditions hold, while XRP’s Q4 potential hinges on key technical levels—contrasts that make YZY’s story a lesson in what not to chase blindly.
FAQ### What exactly happened with Kanye West’s YZY memecoin launch?
Kanye West launched the YZY token on Solana, which pumped 1,400% to $3 before crashing 74% to $0.77 within a day, leading to massive profits for 13 sniper wallets totaling $24.5 million, while thousands of retail investors faced heavy losses.
Are celebrity memecoins like YZY usually scams?
Not always outright scams, but many involve pump-and-dump schemes with insider advantages, as seen in YZY, HAWK, and others, transferring wealth from retail to elites—always research thoroughly and consider risks.
How can I avoid losses in memecoin trading?
Stick to verified platforms like those with strong security, analyze on-chain data for sniper patterns, diversify your portfolio, and avoid FOMO-driven buys—tools from reliable exchanges can help spot red flags early.
猜你喜欢

12月26日市场关键情报,你错过了多少?

加密圣诞劫:损失超600万美元,Trust Wallet扩展钱包被黑分析

三巨头下注1700万美元,FIN强势入局跨境支付

加密货币当圣诞礼物?Z 世代正在重新权衡

踏进稳定币浪潮六年,他看到的支付未来雏形

超600万美元被盗:Trust Wallet源码遭攻击,官方版本为何成黑客后门?

30份预测,筛出五个2026年的加密共识

世界杯「大考」,如何解读明年的预测市场发展前景?

2025加密「造富榜」:12大赢家,谁押对了宝?

「宏观大师」Raoul Pal谈指数增长下的30倍空间:比特币终将超越黄金

Uniswap薪酬争议升级、Maple Finance借贷规模创新高,海外币圈今天在聊啥?

Galaxy对明年的26个预测:比特币仍将ATH,稳定币交易量将超越ACH系统

万亿稳定币之战,Binance决定再次下场

Aave社区治理纷争升级,海外币圈今天在聊啥?

2025巨鲸受难记:豪宅绑架、供应链投毒与被清算的数亿美元

信仰资本市场——加密货币的本质与核心价值

对外狂奶以太坊、内部报告却看跌,Tom Lee团队还值得信任吗?

Coinbase入局预测市场、AAVE治理争议,海外币圈今天在聊啥?
过去 24 小时,加密市场在多个维度展现出强劲的发展势头。主流话题聚焦于 Coinbase 通过收购 The Clearing Company 正式入局预测市场,以及 AAVE 社区内部关于代币激励和治理权的激烈争议。
在生态发展方面,Solana 推出了创新的 Kora 费用层,旨在降低用户交易成本;同时,Perp DEX 赛道竞争加剧,Hyperliquid 与 Lighter 的对决引发了社区对去中心化衍生品未来的广泛讨论。
Coinbase 本周宣布收购 The Clearing Company,这是继上周宣布将在其平台推出预测市场后,又一深化该领域布局的重磅举措。
The Clearing Company 的创始人 Toni Gemayel 及其团队将加入 Coinbase,共同推动预测市场业务的发展。
Coinbase 产品负责人 Shan Aggarwal 表示,预测市场的增长仍处于早期阶段,并预测 2026 年将是该领域的爆发年。
社区对此反应积极,普遍认为 Coinbase 的入场将为预测市场带来巨大的流量和合规性优势。然而,这也引发了关于行业竞争格局的讨论。
Rivalry 创始人 Jai Bhavnani 评论称,对于初创公司而言,如果其产品模式被证明是成功的,那么像 Coinbase 这样的行业巨头就有充分的理由进行复制。
这提醒所有加密领域的创业者,必须构建足够深的护城河,以应对来自巨头的竞争压力。
受监管的预测市场平台 Kalshi 本周推出了其研究部门 Kalshi Research,旨在向学术界和研究人员开放其内部数据,以促进对预测市场相关主题的探索。
其发布的首份研究报告指出,Kalshi 在预测通货膨胀方面的表现已超越华尔街的传统模型。Kalshi 联合创始人 Luana Lopes Lara 对此表示,预测市场的力量在于其生成的宝贵数据,现在是时候更好地利用这些数据了。
与此同时,Kalshi 宣布已支持 BNB Chain(BSC),用户现在可以通过 BSC 网络进行 BNB 和 USDT 的存取款操作。
这一举措被视为 Kalshi 向更广泛的加密用户群体开放其平台的重要一步,旨在解锁全球最大预测市场的访问权限。此外,Kalshi 还透露计划在 2026 年举办首届预测市场大会,进一步推动行业交流与发展。
AAVE 社区近期围绕一项名为「$AAVE 代币对齐,第一阶段——所有权治理」的 ARFC 提案展开了激烈辩论。该提案旨在将 Aave 品牌的所有权和控制权从 Aave Labs 转移至 Aave DAO。
Aave 创始人 Stani Kulechov 公开表示将投票反对该提案,认为其过于简化了复杂的法律和运营结构,可能拖慢 Aave V4 等核心产品的开发进程。
社区对此反应两极分化。一部分人批评 Stani 在治理上采取「双重标准」,并质疑其团队是否侵占了协议收入;而另一部分人则支持其谨慎行事的立场,认为重大治理变更需要更充分的讨论。
这场争议凸显了 DeFi 项目中 DAO 治理理想与核心开发团队实际权力之间的紧张关系。
尽管治理争议导致 AAVE 代币价格承压,但链上数据显示,Stani Kulechov 本人在过去几小时内花费数百万美元大量买入 AAVE。
与此同时,地址为 0xDDC4 的巨鲸在沉寂 6 个月后,再次花费 500 ETH(约 153 万美元)购买了 9,629 枚 AAVE。数据显示,该巨鲸在过去一年中累计买入近 4 万枚 AAVE,但目前仍处于浮亏状态。
创始人和巨鲸在市场波动期间的增持行为,被部分投资者解读为对 AAVE 长期价值的信心信号。
本周热门文章中,Morpho Labs 发布的《主理人解释》详细阐述了 DeFi 中「主理人」的角色。
文章将主理人比作传统金融中的资产管理人,他们设计、部署和管理链上金库(Vaults),为用户提供一键式的多元化投资组合。
与传统基金经理不同,DeFi 主理人通过非托管的智能合约自动执行策略,用户始终保持对其资产的完全控制权。该文章为理解 DeFi 领域的专业化分工和风险管理提供了新的视角。
另一篇广为流传的文章《以太坊 2025:从实验到世界基础设施》则对以太坊在过去一年的发展进行了全面总结。文章指出,2025 年是以太坊从一个实验性项目走向全球金融基础设施的关键一年。通过 Pectra 和 Fusaka 两次硬分叉,以太坊实现了账户抽象和交易成本的大幅降低。
同时,SEC 对以太坊「非证券」属性的明确,以及摩根大通等传统金融巨头在以太坊主网上推出代币化基金,都标志着以太坊正获得主流机构的认可。文章认为,无论是 DeFi 的持续增长,L2 生态的繁荣,还是与 AI 领域的融合,都预示着以太坊作为「世界计算机」的愿景正在逐步成为现实。
Solana 基金会工程团队本周推出了名为 Kora 的费用层解决方案。
Kora 是一个费用中继器和签名节点,旨在为 Solana 生态系统提供更灵活的交易费用支付方式。通过 Kora,用户将能够实现免 gas 费交易,或选择使用任何稳定币及 SPL 代币来支付网络费用。这一创新被视为降低新用户进入门槛、提升 Solana 网络可用性的重要一步。
此外,一篇关于 propAMM(proactive market maker)的深度研究报告在社区引发关注。报告通过对 HumidiFi 等 Solana 上 propAMM 的数据分析指出,Solana 在交易执行质量上已达到甚至超越传统金融(TradFi)市场的水平。
例如,在 SOL-USDC 交易对上,HumidiFi 能够为大额交易提供极具竞争力的点差(0.4-1.6 bps),这已经优于传统市场中某些中盘股的交易滑点。
研究认为,propAMM 正在使「互联网资本市场」的愿景成为现实,而 Solana 正成为这一切发生的最佳场所。
永续合约 DEX(Perp DEX)赛道的竞争日趋白热化。
Hyperliquid 在其最新发布的官方文章中,将新兴的竞争对手 Lighter 与 Binance 等中心化交易所并列,称其为采用中心化排序器(sequencer)的平台。Hyperliquid 借此强调自身「完全链上、由验证者网络运行、无隐藏状态」的透明性优势。
社区普遍将此解读为 Hyperliquid 对 Lighter 的「宣战」。两大平台的技术路径差异也成为讨论焦点:Hyperliquid 主打极致的链上透明度,而 Lighter 则强调通过零知识证明实现「可验证的执行」,为用户提供类似 CLOB(中央限价订单簿)的交易体验。
这场关于去中心化衍生品交易所未来的路线之争,预计将在 2026 年达到高潮。
与此同时,关于 Lighter 交易费用的讨论也浮出水面。有用户指出,Lighter 对一笔 200 万美元的 USD/JPY 外汇交易收取了高达 81 个基点(0.81%)的费用,远高于传统外汇经纪商接近于零的价差。
对此,有观点解释称,Lighter 并非采用与做市商对赌的 B-book 模式,其价格与 TradFi 市场锚定,高费用可能与当前的流动性或做市商平衡偏斜的激励机制有关。如何在高波动性的加密市场中为真实世界资产(RWA)提供更具竞争力的价差,成为 Lighter 未来需要解决的关键问题。