Justin Sun Wins Defamation Lawsuit Against Sina.com and Receives Public Apology

By: blockbeats|2025/02/27 12:00:02
分享
copy
Source: Justin Sun

The rumor of being investigated by the FBI has always been a dark cloud over Justin Sun's public image. The individual and his associated industries have paid a significant price in terms of public opinion. However, truth cannot be faked, and falsehood cannot be made true. Now, with the support of the court, Justin Sun has completely shaken off these shadowy rumors.

Recently, Beijing Sina Internet Information Service Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Sina.com) officially issued a public apology statement, acknowledging that its release of untrue reports regarding TRON founder Justin Sun constituted an infringement of Justin Sun's reputation rights. This apology statement signifies that Sina.com has accepted the first-instance judgment of the Beijing Internet Court in the case of Justin Sun suing Sina.com for reputation rights infringement, marking the end of a 6-year legal battle with Justin Sun winning the case. This is also the second time in nearly a year that Justin Sun has won in a personal reputation rights infringement case. It is worth noting that both of the aforementioned cases revolved around media's untrue reports related to him personally.

Rule of Law as the Criterion: Authoritative media also need to respect facts

According to the civil judgment of the Beijing Internet Court on this case, from 2019 to 2022, Sina.com published articles and related special content on its financial channel with titles such as "Video | Justin Sun: The Most Stylish Post-90s Playing Wildly with Post-90s Elderly Man!" and "Justin Sun Suspected of Insider Trading, FBI, IRS Have Launched Investigations," as well as similar series of articles. The articles, especially the titles, had a clear negative connotation, causing the public to lower their social evaluation of Justin Sun, and the reports also claimed that Justin Sun was involved in improper trading activities and other untrue information. This series of reports was not fully verified and was rendered in a highly serious accusation manner, triggering widespread social attention and public discussion.

The judgment also pointed out that some reports cited an article from the foreign media The Verge, where many of the allegations were not substantiated. The Verge's report quoted unnamed sources, mentioned multiple unsubstantiated issues, but did not provide official evidence or confirmation. These contents, without factual basis, were further reprinted and spread by Sina.com, causing serious damage to Justin Sun's reputation.

Facing the untrue reports, Justin Sun promptly publicly refuted them through social media, clearly stating that the related reports were false information and had hired lawyers to pursue the legal responsibilities of the publishers. However, Sina.com, without proper verification, continued to spread this false information, further damaging Justin Sun's reputation. In response, Justin Sun decided to defend his legitimate rights through legal means.

After a six-year legal battle, the Beijing Internet Court finally issued a judgment, finding that Sina.com had failed in its duty of review, published highly inaccurate content, and infringed on Justin Sun's reputation rights. The court required Sina.com to remove the related reports and publicly apologize to Justin Sun in newspapers distributed nationwide and on its official website, while also providing compensation.

This ruling powerfully demonstrates that in a society based on the rule of law, judicial impartiality will not be swayed by the fact that the defendant is an authoritative media outlet. The court's strict examination of evidence and precise delineation of the boundary between freedom of speech and reputation rights showcased the judicial principle of "basing decisions on facts and relying on the law."

The successful outcome of this case not only vindicates Justin Sun's personal reputation rights but also provides valuable experience for public figures on how to uphold their rights through legal means when facing false reporting. Experts have stated that the media must thoroughly verify their sources of information when reporting on public figures and events, to avoid spreading unverified content unilaterally and thus prevent causing harm to innocent parties and bearing corresponding legal responsibility.

It is worth noting that in June 2024, Justin Sun also won another lawsuit. In this case involving a reputation dispute with the Chongqing Business Media Group, the Yubei District People's Court in Chongqing determined that the media outlet had published false information about Justin Sun, damaging his reputation, and ordered the Chongqing Business Media Group to issue a public apology and compensate for related expenses. The court emphasized that the media must fulfill necessary verification obligations when reporting on public figures to ensure the authenticity of the content.

Breaking Preconceptions: Justin Sun's "Legal Victories"

For a long time, Justin Sun has been labeled with terms like "rug pull" and "hype" due to differing interpretations of his actions and views in the cryptocurrency field. In this recent judgment, the court found that certain articles from Sina.com used expressions like "fraud," "money laundering," and "FBI investigation" without sufficient factual basis and failed to provide a balanced coverage of Justin Sun's public rebuttals, ultimately constituting a violation of his reputation.

For Justin Sun, this legal victory is not only a triumph in the legal realm but also a significant turning point in his public image. The court document mentioned that Justin Sun actively presented evidence during the lawsuit, clarified multiple times on social media, and engaged lawyers to uphold his rights, ultimately using legal means to refute baseless accusations. The court's support allowed him to emerge victorious from long-standing negative public opinion, setting an example for legal recourse for blockchain industry professionals.

This judgment reveals the pitfalls of "labeling-based perceptions" in the public opinion arena. Previously, Justin Sun was often portrayed by the media as a "speculator in the crypto sphere," but the court found that some accusations lacked evidence and were even fabricated or distorted. For instance, the court document highlighted that the so-called "FBI investigation" and similar content were actually based on unverified information and severely lacked balance with Justin Sun's public responses.

This outcome serves as a reminder to the public: in an era of information overload, any evaluation of an individual should be based on facts rather than rumors. Justin Sun, after the ruling, stated that he will "continue to focus on the compliance of blockchain technology," and his efforts in recent years to facilitate dialogue between the industry and regulators may be worthy of a more objective review.

Justin Sun's successful lawsuit is a safeguard of individual rights under the rule of law and a warning to the media about their responsibility. It proves that whether a public figure or an ordinary citizen, the right to reputation is equally protected by the law. At the same time, this case also provides a moment of reflection for society—only by abandoning preconceived biases, relying on facts as the basis, and the law as the limit, can we build a more rational and just public opinion environment.

Justin Sun's "comeback" and "breakthrough" may have just begun; the next episode promises to be even more exciting.


This article is a contributed submission and does not represent the views of BlockBeats

猜你喜歡

Trust Wallet 遭黑客攻擊最大損失達350萬美元

Key Takeaways 最大受害者損失了約350萬美元,該錢包已休眠一年。 第二大損失達140萬美元,該錢包已休眠兩年以上。 黑客共竊取超過600萬美元加密資產,其中超過400萬美元已轉移至CEX。 自托管錢包面臨基礎設施漏洞的潛在風險。 WEEX Crypto News, 26 December 2025 近期,Trust Wallet 發生了一起嚴重的黑客事件,此次事件引發了業界廣泛關注。在這起事件中,Trust Wallet的一個錢包損失了價值高達350萬美元的加密資產,該錢包在此次攻擊前已經休眠了一年多。此外,另一個損失較大的錢包也損失了約140萬美元,在攻擊發生前已經休眠超過兩年。 Trust Wallet…

项目方將40萬美元BDXN代幣注入多個交易所

Key Takeaways 三個BDXN項目方相關的錢包地址向多個交易所存入價值約40萬美元的BDXN代幣。 這些代幣於兩個月前從項目方的錢包轉出。 相關監測由onchainschool.pro 提供。 代幣轉移涉及的地址包括0xD5682dcA35D78c13b5103eB85c46cDCe28508dfB等。 WEEX Crypto News, 26 December 2025 BDXN項目方關聯錢包的最新動向 近期,BDXN項目方的部分地址將價值40萬美元的BDXN代幣注入多家交易所。據onchainschool.pro的監測顯示,與BDXN項目方相關的三個主要錢包在過去三小時內完成這一轉移操作,而這批代幣則早在兩個月前便從項目方錢包中轉出。 監測機構報告及相關地址詳情 這次轉移操作首次由onchainschool.pro監測到,並在ChainCatcher等多家媒體上披露。根據報告的數據,涉及到的三個錢包地址分別是:0xD5682dcA35D78c13b5103eB85c46cDCe28508dfB、0xD0Fc2894Dd2fe427a05980c2E3De8B7A89CB2672以及0xAc245a570A914C84300f24a07eb59425bbdC1B48。這些地址攜帶的代幣價值總計約40萬美元。 轉移代幣的未來意圖及市場影響…

# 龐貝與互聯網:Base 網絡上的 PancakeSwap V3 池中流動性獎勵啟動

Key Takeaways PancakeSwap 透過 Brevis Incentra 在 Base 網絡引入了 12 個 V3 池並開始提供流動性獎勵。 使用者可以在 Optimism 平台上通過 Incentra 添加流動性,不僅獲得交易費用,還能賺取…

代幣 VS 股權,Aave 爭議的來龍去脈

這是 Aave 要面對的問題,更是整個行業要面對的問題

12月26日市場關鍵情報,你錯過了多少?

1. 鏈上資金:本日有 7.8 百萬美元流入 Hyperliquid;5.5 百萬美元流出 Solana 2. 最大漲跌幅:$ISLM、$FTN 3. 熱門新聞:Trust Wallet 將確保所有受影響的用戶都能獲得退款,用戶需盡快完成程序升級

加密聖誕劫:損失超600萬美元,Trust Wallet 擴展錢包遭駭分析

Trust Wallet 瀏覽器擴充功能 2.68 版被發現存在惡意後門,導致用戶資金被盜,總損失超過 600 萬美元。

熱門幣種

最新加密貨幣要聞

閱讀更多