L1 and L2 are vying to claim ultra-high TPS. Is the demand really about speed?

By: blockbeats|2025/04/14 05:45:03
分享
copy
Original Article Title: The Great TPS Lie: Crypto's Obsession With Solving Problems Nobody Has
Original Article Author: @therosieum, @tenprotocol Member
Original Article Translation: Diodeep

Editor's Note: The article criticizes the crypto industry's blind pursuit of high TPS (transactions per second), arguing that this race is based on false advertising and overlooks real user needs. Projects, in order to attract funding and attention, exaggerate lab data, sacrificing decentralization, security, and usability to solve often irrelevant problems. The author calls for a focus on genuinely meaningful blockchain applications, building according to actual use case scales, rather than chasing unrealistic digital fantasies.

The following is the original content (reorganized for ease of understanding):

Every week, a new L1 or L2 project goes live, claiming: "We can process 100,000 transactions per second!"

Sometimes it's 50,000 transactions, sometimes it's 1 million.

The exact number doesn't matter because it's all mostly nonsense.

The "Faster Than Thou" Race of Transaction Speed

The scalability war has devolved into crypto's most embarrassing showdown. Every new protocol must claim a higher TPS than the previous one, regardless of whether these speeds are:

· Achievable beyond their AWS testnet (spoiler: it's almost impossible)

· Meaningful for real-world applications

· Necessary for scenarios used by actual humans

This obsession with throughput is like the crypto world taking a Lamborghini for a joyride during rush hour. The problem isn't with the specs but with the context.

Talking About Real Data

Visa, the payment giant that processes transactions for billions of people globally, averages around 1,700 transactions per second. Their theoretical maximum is around 24,000 TPS, but they have never needed this capacity in decades of operation.

Meanwhile, most blockchain projects struggle to attract even 100 daily active users.

If your Discord emojis outnumber your on-chain transactions, you might be solving a problem that exists only in your imagination.

The Hidden Cost of Chasing "Blockchain Scalability Trilemma"

The obsession with theoretical throughput can lead to real-world issues that harm users.

Firstly, there is the disguised centralization: In pursuit of high TPS, decentralization is often sacrificed for the sake of a marketing number.

Secondly, there is security theater: Cutting corners in hasty scaling introduces vulnerabilities that will sooner or later be exploited.

Furthermore, there is engineering talent drain: Top talent is not building what users really need but instead is stuck optimizing synthetic benchmarks.

Lastly, there is blatant deception: Network propaganda's lab numbers crumble under real-world conditions.

The Unsettling Truth

There are two reasons for the obsession with extreme scalability:

· You need to sound tech-savvy to justify your $100M funding

· You desperately want your chain to stand out in a market of over 5000 blockchains

User needs are only an afterthought. The real game is to make retail investors believe you are the ultimate solution—VCs then act as the loudest KOLs for your TPS narrative.

L1 and L2 are vying to claim ultra-high TPS. Is the demand really about speed?

Building Something Truly Meaningful

If you are really building something in this space, here's a reality check:

· Focus on building things only achievable with blockchain

· Design an economic model that doesn't require monthly rug pulls for user acquisition

· Create a user interface that doesn't make regular people want to smash their computers

· Build to the scale of actual use cases, not for the sake of a flashy pitch deck

Scalability Reality Check

Next time a project boasts about handling 500,000 TPS, ask them: "What are these transactions actually doing? Who is generating them? For what purpose?"

When they stutter about "future adoption" and "web3 social," you'll know the answer.

True innovation isn't theoretical performance in a vacuum; it's about building what people truly need and scaling appropriately to demand.

Everything else is just expensive performance art disguised as technology.

Original Post Link

猜你喜歡

Trust Wallet 遭黑客攻擊最大損失達350萬美元

Key Takeaways 最大受害者損失了約350萬美元,該錢包已休眠一年。 第二大損失達140萬美元,該錢包已休眠兩年以上。 黑客共竊取超過600萬美元加密資產,其中超過400萬美元已轉移至CEX。 自托管錢包面臨基礎設施漏洞的潛在風險。 WEEX Crypto News, 26 December 2025 近期,Trust Wallet 發生了一起嚴重的黑客事件,此次事件引發了業界廣泛關注。在這起事件中,Trust Wallet的一個錢包損失了價值高達350萬美元的加密資產,該錢包在此次攻擊前已經休眠了一年多。此外,另一個損失較大的錢包也損失了約140萬美元,在攻擊發生前已經休眠超過兩年。 Trust Wallet…

项目方將40萬美元BDXN代幣注入多個交易所

Key Takeaways 三個BDXN項目方相關的錢包地址向多個交易所存入價值約40萬美元的BDXN代幣。 這些代幣於兩個月前從項目方的錢包轉出。 相關監測由onchainschool.pro 提供。 代幣轉移涉及的地址包括0xD5682dcA35D78c13b5103eB85c46cDCe28508dfB等。 WEEX Crypto News, 26 December 2025 BDXN項目方關聯錢包的最新動向 近期,BDXN項目方的部分地址將價值40萬美元的BDXN代幣注入多家交易所。據onchainschool.pro的監測顯示,與BDXN項目方相關的三個主要錢包在過去三小時內完成這一轉移操作,而這批代幣則早在兩個月前便從項目方錢包中轉出。 監測機構報告及相關地址詳情 這次轉移操作首次由onchainschool.pro監測到,並在ChainCatcher等多家媒體上披露。根據報告的數據,涉及到的三個錢包地址分別是:0xD5682dcA35D78c13b5103eB85c46cDCe28508dfB、0xD0Fc2894Dd2fe427a05980c2E3De8B7A89CB2672以及0xAc245a570A914C84300f24a07eb59425bbdC1B48。這些地址攜帶的代幣價值總計約40萬美元。 轉移代幣的未來意圖及市場影響…

# 龐貝與互聯網:Base 網絡上的 PancakeSwap V3 池中流動性獎勵啟動

Key Takeaways PancakeSwap 透過 Brevis Incentra 在 Base 網絡引入了 12 個 V3 池並開始提供流動性獎勵。 使用者可以在 Optimism 平台上通過 Incentra 添加流動性,不僅獲得交易費用,還能賺取…

代幣 VS 股權,Aave 爭議的來龍去脈

這是 Aave 要面對的問題,更是整個行業要面對的問題

12月26日市場關鍵情報,你錯過了多少?

1. 鏈上資金:本日有 7.8 百萬美元流入 Hyperliquid;5.5 百萬美元流出 Solana 2. 最大漲跌幅:$ISLM、$FTN 3. 熱門新聞:Trust Wallet 將確保所有受影響的用戶都能獲得退款,用戶需盡快完成程序升級

加密聖誕劫:損失超600萬美元,Trust Wallet 擴展錢包遭駭分析

Trust Wallet 瀏覽器擴充功能 2.68 版被發現存在惡意後門,導致用戶資金被盜,總損失超過 600 萬美元。

熱門幣種

最新加密貨幣要聞

閱讀更多