logo

VC Asset Bubble History: Why Does Every New Coin Seem to Go to Zero?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/21 05:45:01
分享
copy
Original Title:《The Great Crypto VC Bubble: Why Every New Token Trends to Zero (Part 1)》
Original Author: 0xLouisT
Original Translator: DeepTech TechFlow

Shitcoins are continuing to bleed out — why? Is it due to high FDV, or the CEX listing strategy? Should Binance and Coinbase just directly TWAP their funds into new shitcoins? The real culprit isn't new — it all traces back to the 2021 crypto VC bubble.

In this article, I will dissect how we got to where we are today. In the upcoming articles, I will explore the impact of this phenomenon on projects, the liquid market, possible future trends, and provide some advice for entrepreneurs in the current environment.

ICO Craze (2017-2018)

The crypto industry is fundamentally a highly liquid industry — projects can mint tokens at any time, these tokens can represent anything, regardless of its stage. Before 2017, most trading activity happened on public markets, where anyone could directly purchase tokens through centralized exchanges.

Then, the ICO (Initial Coin Offering) bubble arrived: a wild speculative era quickly exploited by scammers. Its ending was like any other bubble: lawsuits, fraud, and regulatory crackdowns. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) intervened, almost making ICOs illegal. To evade the U.S. judicial system, founders had to seek other ways to raise funds.

VC Asset Bubble History: Why Does Every New Coin Seem to Go to Zero?

VC Craze (2021-2022)

As retail investors were forced out, founders turned to institutional investors. From 2018 to 2020, the crypto VC space gradually expanded — some companies were pure VC firms, while others were hedge funds, allocating a small part of their Assets Under Management (AUM) to VC bets. At the time, investing in shitcoins was a contrarian move — many believed these tokens would eventually go to zero.

Then came 2021. The bull market rapidly skyrocketed the portfolios of VC investments (at least on paper). By April, many funds had already seen returns of 20x or even 100x. Crypto VC suddenly looked like a "money printer." Limited Partners (LPs) flocked in, eager to catch the next wave. VC firms raised new funds, 10 times, even 100 times the size of previous ones, believing they could replicate these astounding returns.

Source: Galaxy Research

In addition, there are also some psychological reasons that explain why venture capital is so attractive to LPs. I have analyzed this in detail in a previous article: The True Reason Venture Capital Prevails Over Liquidity in the Crypto Space.

Hangover Period (2022-2024): The Dilemma and Transformation of Crypto Venture Capital

Then, in quick succession came 2022: the Luna collapse, 3AC bankruptcy, FTX closure—billions of dollars in paper gains evaporated overnight.

Contrary to popular belief, most VCs did not cash out at the market peak. Like everyone else, they went through the market crash downturn together.

And now, they face two major challenges:

· Disappointed Limited Partners (LPs): LPs who once cheered for 100x returns are now demanding quick exits, putting pressure on the funds to de-risk early and lock in gains.

· Too Much Capital: There is a significant amount of untapped venture capital (dry powder) in the market, but high-quality projects are in short supply. Many funds, to meet investment thresholds and pave the way for the next funding round, choose to invest in economically unreasonable projects rather than return capital to LPs.

Today, most crypto VCs are in a dilemma: unable to raise new funds, holding a pile of low-quality projects destined to follow the "high FDV to zero" script. Under LP pressure, these VCs have shifted from long-term vision supporters to short-term exit chasers. They frequently sell off large-cap tokens supported by VCs (such as alternative L1s, L2s, and infrastructure tokens), whose high valuations were artificially inflated by themselves.

In other words, the incentive structure and timeframe of crypto VCs have undergone significant changes:

2020: VCs were contrarians, capital-constrained, focused on long-term development. 2024: VCs have become crowded, capital-abundant, and more short-sighted.

I believe that the performance of VC funds from 2021 to 2023 will mostly fall below expectations. VC returns follow a power-law distribution, where a few winners make up for the majority of losers. But due to forced early selling, this pattern will be disrupted, leading to overall weakened performance.

If you want to learn more about average venture capital returns, I have previously written a related article.

It is not difficult to understand why more and more founders and communities are skeptical of venture capital. The incentive structure and timeline of venture capital are not aligned with the founders' goals, leading to a shift in the following trends:

· Community-Driven Funding: Projects are more inclined to raise funds through community support rather than relying on venture capital.

· Long-Term Support with Liquidity: Compared to venture capital, liquidity is gradually becoming the primary source of long-term support for tokens.

Evaluating Liquidity / Venture Capital Cycles

Tracking the capital flow between venture funding and the liquid market is crucial. I use an indicator to assess the state of the venture capital market. While it is not perfect, it is very informative.

I assume that venture capital will linearly deploy 70% of its funds over three years—this seems to be the trend for most venture capital.

VC 3y Linear Deployment Visualization

Based on the venture capital fundraising data provided by @glxyresearch, I applied a weighted sum model, combining 16 quarters of deployment rates to estimate the remaining untapped funds (dry powder) in the system. By the fourth quarter of 2022, around $48 billion of venture capital funds remained undeployed. However, with a stall in new fundraising, this number has halved at least and continues to decrease.

VC Undeployed Capital Visualization Chart

Next, I will compare the remaining venture capital funds each quarter with TOTAL2 (total crypto market cap excluding Bitcoin). Since venture capital typically invests in altcoins, TOTAL2 is the best proxy indicator. If venture capital funds are disproportionately high relative to TOTAL2, the market will not be able to absorb future token generation events (TGEs). Normalizing this data can reveal the cyclical nature of the liquidity/venture capital ratio.

Crypto Venture Capital and the Liquid Market: Cyclical Patterns and Future Outlook

Usually, when in the "VC euphoria" range, the risk-adjusted return of the liquid market tends to outperform venture capital. The "VC capitulation" range, however, is more complex—it may signify VCs giving up or indicate an overheated liquid market.

Like all markets, crypto venture capital and the liquid market follow cyclical patterns. The excess capital accumulated in 2021/2022 is rapidly being depleted, making fundraising more challenging for founders. At the same time, cash-strapped VC firms are becoming more selective in trades and terms.

I will end it here, and the next article will delve deeper into the impact of this phenomenon on the liquid market.

Summary

In recent years, VC fund performance has been lackluster, with VC firms shifting towards short-term sell-offs to return capital to LPs. Many prominent crypto VC firms may not survive in the coming years.

The misalignment between VC firms and founders is driving founders to seek alternative financing channels.

The oversupply of VC capital has led to irrational resource allocation, and I will delve into this in detail in subsequent articles.

To be continued...

Original Article Link

猜你喜歡

Trust Wallet 遭黑客攻擊最大損失達350萬美元

Key Takeaways 最大受害者損失了約350萬美元，該錢包已休眠一年。 第二大損失達140萬美元，該錢包已休眠兩年以上。 黑客共竊取超過600萬美元加密資產，其中超過400萬美元已轉移至CEX。 自托管錢包面臨基礎設施漏洞的潛在風險。 WEEX Crypto News, 26 December 2025 近期，Trust Wallet 發生了一起嚴重的黑客事件，此次事件引發了業界廣泛關注。在這起事件中，Trust Wallet的一個錢包損失了價值高達350萬美元的加密資產，該錢包在此次攻擊前已經休眠了一年多。此外，另一個損失較大的錢包也損失了約140萬美元，在攻擊發生前已經休眠超過兩年。 Trust Wallet…

项目方將40萬美元BDXN代幣注入多個交易所

Key Takeaways 三個BDXN項目方相關的錢包地址向多個交易所存入價值約40萬美元的BDXN代幣。 這些代幣於兩個月前從項目方的錢包轉出。 相關監測由onchainschool.pro 提供。 代幣轉移涉及的地址包括0xD5682dcA35D78c13b5103eB85c46cDCe28508dfB等。 WEEX Crypto News, 26 December 2025 BDXN項目方關聯錢包的最新動向 近期，BDXN項目方的部分地址將價值40萬美元的BDXN代幣注入多家交易所。據onchainschool.pro的監測顯示，與BDXN項目方相關的三個主要錢包在過去三小時內完成這一轉移操作，而這批代幣則早在兩個月前便從項目方錢包中轉出。 監測機構報告及相關地址詳情 這次轉移操作首次由onchainschool.pro監測到，並在ChainCatcher等多家媒體上披露。根據報告的數據，涉及到的三個錢包地址分別是：0xD5682dcA35D78c13b5103eB85c46cDCe28508dfB、0xD0Fc2894Dd2fe427a05980c2E3De8B7A89CB2672以及0xAc245a570A914C84300f24a07eb59425bbdC1B48。這些地址攜帶的代幣價值總計約40萬美元。 轉移代幣的未來意圖及市場影響…

# 龐貝與互聯網：Base 網絡上的 PancakeSwap V3 池中流動性獎勵啟動

Key Takeaways PancakeSwap 透過 Brevis Incentra 在 Base 網絡引入了 12 個 V3 池並開始提供流動性獎勵。 使用者可以在 Optimism 平台上通過 Incentra 添加流動性，不僅獲得交易費用，還能賺取…

代幣 VS 股權，Aave 爭議的來龍去脈

這是 Aave 要面對的問題，更是整個行業要面對的問題

12月26日市場關鍵情報，你錯過了多少？

1. 鏈上資金：本日有 7.8 百萬美元流入 Hyperliquid；5.5 百萬美元流出 Solana 2. 最大漲跌幅：$ISLM、$FTN 3. 熱門新聞：Trust Wallet 將確保所有受影響的用戶都能獲得退款，用戶需盡快完成程序升級

加密聖誕劫：損失超600萬美元，Trust Wallet 擴展錢包遭駭分析

Trust Wallet 瀏覽器擴充功能 2.68 版被發現存在惡意後門，導致用戶資金被盜，總損失超過 600 萬美元。

熱門幣種

最新加密貨幣要聞

04:46

特朗普與澤倫斯基會晤改期，將討論烏克蘭衝突問題

BlockBeats 消息，12 月 28 日，根據白宮最新公佈的日程安排，美國總統特朗普和烏克蘭總統澤連斯基在佛羅里達州的會晤時間已從週日下午 3 點（美國東部時間）提前至下午 1 點（美國東部時間）。澤連斯基週六抵達美國，兩位領導人將在海湖莊園會晤，討論烏克蘭衝突問題。
04:46

市場仍然維持著「恐慌」情緒，今日加密貪婪與恐懼指數為 24。

BlockBeats 消息，12 月 28 日，据 Alternative 数据，今日加密货币恐慌与贪婪指數為 24（昨日為 23），市場仍舊維持「恐懼」情緒。自 11 月 3 日以來，加密恐慌指數持續低於 30，此前類似的情況發生在 2022 年四季度。註：恐懼指數閾值為 0-100，包含指標：波動性（25%）＋市場交易量（25%）＋社交媒體熱度（15%）＋市場調查（15%）＋比特幣在整個市場中的比例（10%）＋谷歌熱詞分析（10%）。
04:16

24小時現貨資金流入/流出榜單：BTC淨流出6500萬美元，FLOW淨流出930萬美元

BlockBeats 消息，12 月 28 日，据 Coinglass 数据显示，过去 24 小时，加密现货资金净流出榜如下：BTC 净流出 6500 萬美元；ETH 净流出 2400 萬美元；GAS 净流出 1061 萬美元；FLOW 净流出 930 萬美元；LPT 净流出 685 萬美元。加密现货资金净流入榜如下：TRX 净流入 1200 萬美元；SOL 净流入 1013 萬美元；SUI 净流入 723 萬美元；ZEC 净流入 620 萬美元；ADA 净流入 530 萬美元。
03:16

美股市值已达历史新高，达到创纪录的 72 兆美元。

BlockBeats 消息，12 月 28 日，KobeissiLetter 发布的数据显示，美国股市规模已达到历史最高水平，公开股票市场总市值现已达到创纪录的 72 兆美元。这相当于欧洲市场规模的 3.5 倍以上，也高于欧洲、中国、日本、印度、法国和英国的股票市场市值总和。与此同时，纳斯达克市值自 2022 年以来已经翻了一番多，达到创纪录的约 38 兆美元。同时，纽约证券交易所的市值飙升至 32 兆美元左右，增长了约 10 兆美元。
03:16

某巨鯨提前清倉UNI累計獲利2,341.5萬美元，未等待「今日1億枚銷毀」利好落地

BlockBeats 消息，12 月 28 日，据链上分析师 Ai 姨（@ai_9684xtpa）监測，「2020 年 9 月起 UNI 波段累計獲利 2154 萬美元巨鯨」早在五個月前已賣出持倉，並未等待「今日 1 億枚 UNI 銷毀完成」利好落地。該鯨魚曾持倉 662,605 枚 UNI，成本 5.99 美元，賣出均價 8.82 美元，雖然未能在最高點 12 美元附近賣出，但仍獲利 187.5 萬美元，其三次 UNI 波段累計獲利 2,341.5 萬美元，勝率 100%。
閱讀更多
社區
iconiconiconiconiconiconiconicon

客戶服務：@weikecs

商務合作：@weikecs

量化做市商合作：[email protected]

VIP服務：[email protected]