Web3 New Tale of Two Cities: Stablecoins and Money Market Funds

By: blockbeats|2025/03/31 07:00:03
分享
copy
Original Article Title: Stablecoins and the parallels with Money Market Funds
Original Article Authors: @shawnwlim, @artichokecap Founders
Original Article Translation: zhouzhou, BlockBeats

Editor's Note: The regulatory dispute over stablecoins bears resemblance to the experience of Money Market Funds (MMFs) half a century ago. MMFs were initially designed for corporate cash management but faced criticism due to lack of deposit insurance and vulnerability to runs, impacting bank stability and monetary policy. Nevertheless, MMF assets now exceed $7.2 trillion. The 2008 financial crisis led to the collapse of the Reserve Fund, and in 2023, the SEC is still pushing for MMF regulatory reform. The history of MMFs suggests that stablecoins may face similar regulatory challenges but could ultimately become a crucial part of the financial system.

The following is the original content (slightly edited for readability):

Stablecoins are exciting, and the upcoming stablecoin legislation in the US represents a rare opportunity to upgrade the existing financial system. Those studying financial history will notice parallels between it and the invention and development of Money Market Funds about half a century ago.

Money Market Funds were invented in the 1970s as a cash management solution, primarily for corporates. At that time, US banks were prohibited from paying interest on balances in checking accounts, and corporations were often unable to maintain savings accounts. If a business wanted to earn interest on idle cash, they had to buy US Treasuries, engage in repurchase agreements, invest in commercial paper, or certificates of deposit. Managing cash was a cumbersome and operationally intensive process.

The design of Money Market Funds was to maintain a stable share value, with each share pegged at $1. The Reserve Fund, Inc. was the first MMF. Launched in 1971, it was introduced as "a convenient alternative for investing temporary cash balances," which would typically be placed in money market instruments like Treasuries, commercial paper, bank acceptances, or CDs, with an initial asset size of $1 million.

Other investment giants quickly followed suit: Dreyfus (now part of BNYglobal), Fidelity, Vanguard_Group. In the 1980s, almost half of Vanguard's legendary mutual fund business growth was attributable to its Money Market Fund.

Web3 New Tale of Two Cities: Stablecoins and Money Market Funds

During his tenure as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1979 to 1987, Paul Volcker was highly critical of Money Market Funds (MMFs). He continued his criticism of MMFs as late as 2011.

Today, many of the criticisms raised by policymakers against stablecoins echo those from half a century ago against Money Market Funds:

· Systemic Risk and Banking Safety Concerns: MMFs lack deposit insurance and a lender of last resort mechanism, unlike insured banks. Because of this, MMFs are susceptible to rapid runs, which could exacerbate financial instability and lead to contagion. There are also concerns that deposits shifting from insured banks to MMFs could weaken the banking sector as banks lose their low-cost and stable deposit base.

· Unfair Regulatory Arbitrage: MMFs provide bank-like services, maintaining a stable $1 share price, but without rigorous regulatory oversight or capital requirements.

· Weakening of Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism: MMFs could weaken the Fed's monetary policy tools, as traditional monetary policy instruments like bank reserves are less effective when funds flow from banks to MMFs.

Today, MMFs have financial assets exceeding $7.2 trillion. For reference, M2 (excluding MMF assets) is $21.7 trillion.

In the late 1990s, the rapid growth in MMF assets was a result of financial deregulation (the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, fueling a wave of financial innovation), while the prosperity of the internet facilitated better electronic and online trading systems, speeding up fund inflows into MMFs.

Do you see a pattern here? (I would like to point out that even half a century later, the regulatory struggle around MMFs is far from over. The SEC adopted MMF reforms in 2023, including raising minimum liquidity requirements and removing fund manager restrictions on investor redemptions.)

Unfortunately, the Reserve Fund met its end after the 2008 financial crisis. It held some Lehman Brothers debt securities, which were written down to zero, leading to the fund's breaking of the buck event and significant redemptions.

Original Article Link

猜你喜歡

Trust Wallet 遭黑客攻擊最大損失達350萬美元

Key Takeaways 最大受害者損失了約350萬美元,該錢包已休眠一年。 第二大損失達140萬美元,該錢包已休眠兩年以上。 黑客共竊取超過600萬美元加密資產,其中超過400萬美元已轉移至CEX。 自托管錢包面臨基礎設施漏洞的潛在風險。 WEEX Crypto News, 26 December 2025 近期,Trust Wallet 發生了一起嚴重的黑客事件,此次事件引發了業界廣泛關注。在這起事件中,Trust Wallet的一個錢包損失了價值高達350萬美元的加密資產,該錢包在此次攻擊前已經休眠了一年多。此外,另一個損失較大的錢包也損失了約140萬美元,在攻擊發生前已經休眠超過兩年。 Trust Wallet…

项目方將40萬美元BDXN代幣注入多個交易所

Key Takeaways 三個BDXN項目方相關的錢包地址向多個交易所存入價值約40萬美元的BDXN代幣。 這些代幣於兩個月前從項目方的錢包轉出。 相關監測由onchainschool.pro 提供。 代幣轉移涉及的地址包括0xD5682dcA35D78c13b5103eB85c46cDCe28508dfB等。 WEEX Crypto News, 26 December 2025 BDXN項目方關聯錢包的最新動向 近期,BDXN項目方的部分地址將價值40萬美元的BDXN代幣注入多家交易所。據onchainschool.pro的監測顯示,與BDXN項目方相關的三個主要錢包在過去三小時內完成這一轉移操作,而這批代幣則早在兩個月前便從項目方錢包中轉出。 監測機構報告及相關地址詳情 這次轉移操作首次由onchainschool.pro監測到,並在ChainCatcher等多家媒體上披露。根據報告的數據,涉及到的三個錢包地址分別是:0xD5682dcA35D78c13b5103eB85c46cDCe28508dfB、0xD0Fc2894Dd2fe427a05980c2E3De8B7A89CB2672以及0xAc245a570A914C84300f24a07eb59425bbdC1B48。這些地址攜帶的代幣價值總計約40萬美元。 轉移代幣的未來意圖及市場影響…

# 龐貝與互聯網:Base 網絡上的 PancakeSwap V3 池中流動性獎勵啟動

Key Takeaways PancakeSwap 透過 Brevis Incentra 在 Base 網絡引入了 12 個 V3 池並開始提供流動性獎勵。 使用者可以在 Optimism 平台上通過 Incentra 添加流動性,不僅獲得交易費用,還能賺取…

代幣 VS 股權,Aave 爭議的來龍去脈

這是 Aave 要面對的問題,更是整個行業要面對的問題

12月26日市場關鍵情報,你錯過了多少?

1. 鏈上資金:本日有 7.8 百萬美元流入 Hyperliquid;5.5 百萬美元流出 Solana 2. 最大漲跌幅:$ISLM、$FTN 3. 熱門新聞:Trust Wallet 將確保所有受影響的用戶都能獲得退款,用戶需盡快完成程序升級

加密聖誕劫:損失超600萬美元,Trust Wallet 擴展錢包遭駭分析

Trust Wallet 瀏覽器擴充功能 2.68 版被發現存在惡意後門,導致用戶資金被盜,總損失超過 600 萬美元。

熱門幣種

最新加密貨幣要聞

閱讀更多