Ye Kai: Reframing Asset Liquidity — How RWA Reshapes Data Asset Management Model

By: blockbeats|2025/04/21 03:15:04
分享
copy
Original Article Title: "Ye Kai: Rethinking Asset Liquidity — How RWA Reshapes Data Asset Management Models | China Data Asset Management 50+ Forum"
Original Source: Shanghai Data Exchange

1. High RWA Financing Cost in Hong Kong

The current RWA market in Hong Kong faces high financing costs. From a cost perspective, the financing cost for high-quality domestic enterprises through bank channels generally remains in the range of 3.5%-4%, while the comprehensive cost of issuing RWAs in Hong Kong (including HKD 4-5 million issuance expenses) is as high as 10%, showing a clear cost inversion phenomenon. In this context, the core appeal for listed companies to participate in RWA has shifted from simple financing to market value management. A typical case shows that a technology company, after issuing RWA, saw its market value climb from HKD 6.7 billion to HKD 14.6 billion within three to four months.

The transitional nature of the Hong Kong regulatory framework is particularly prominent. According to current regulations, debt-based RWAs are limited to professional investors (PIs) participation, and licensed trading platforms cannot open a secondary retail market. This restriction objectively drives the market to form a "securitization-first, tokenization-follow-up" Web2.5 model: companies need to first transform assets into fund products regulated by a Type 9 license before undergoing tokenization by licensed institutions. Although liquidity is constrained in the short term, it creates an opportunity to build a multi-level cross-border market system.

2. Multi-level Market Collaborative Architecture

The key to unlocking the liquidity dilemma in the Hong Kong market lies in establishing a cross-border collaborative mechanism, such as establishing a three-layer experimental architecture for Mainland China-Hong Kong-Singapore.

· The first layer is the onshore ownership layer, where data asset trading platforms in Mainland China conduct data asset standardization processing, prepare assets through a sandbox mechanism, and ensure onshore ownership of core data, among other operations.

· The second layer is the offshore issuance layer, where Hong Kong licensed institutions package processed data assets into compliant fund products and conduct private placements based on a Type 9 license.

· The third layer is the global circulation layer, where Singapore leverages the advantage of an RMO license to accommodate secondary market circulation, achieving compliant cross-border circulation through the China-Singapore international data channel.

The innovative value of this architecture lies in three dimensions: first, the onshore link strictly observes data security bottom line to avoid risks of Regulation 38; second, Hong Kong leverages the professional advantages of licensed institutions, focusing on primary market issuance; third, Singapore opens the secondary retail market, activating global capital participation.

3. Structured Financial Design Thinking

Mere asset tokenization cannot form effective financial products; instead, structured financial product design is needed. Taking BlackRock's fund operation model as an example, BlackRock combines mid-term US Treasury ETFs with smart contract collateralization to ensure a base return of 6-8% while unlocking premium floating space through native token issuance. This model has successfully attracted over 30% of crypto-native capital allocation demand.

Offshore support system is equally important. For example, in the Hainan Free Trade Port, the VIE structure + FT account combination can be tested to achieve cross-border asset transfer and fund circulation in a physically isolated framework. The "regulatory sandbox + whitelist network" design provides a solution for the circulation of sensitive assets. This model uses the VIE structure to achieve the outbound transfer of asset ownership in a legal sense, utilizes the FT account system to build a firewall for fund flow, and establishes a dedicated network channel to overcome cross-border operational barriers.

IV. Wall Street Stair-step Penetration Strategy

BlackRock's stair-step penetration strategy is worthy of special attention. From a Bitcoin spot ETF (with over $30 billion in AUM) to tokenized money market funds (BUIDL Fund surpassing $1 billion in scale), and then collaborating with Circle to issue the stablecoin USDB, its development path demonstrates a seamless transition from the institutional market to the retail market. Even more disruptive is the institution's plan to transform $11.6 trillion in medium to long-term assets into on-chain liquidity through collateralization, potentially reshaping the global fund circulation paradigm.

A Distributed Digital Identity (DID) system constitutes a strategic fulcrum. BlackRock explicitly positions DID as the infrastructure for inclusive finance in public documents, attempting to break down barriers between institutional and retail markets through a verifiable credit system. The insight for Hong Kong is that RWA development should not be limited to the professional investor market but should encompass forward-looking initiatives such as digital identity authentication and on-chain settlement capabilities.

V. Development Assessment and Path Selection

The Hong Kong RWA ecosystem is currently in a phase where regulatory arbitrage opportunities overlap with the key period of model standardization. The breakthrough direction presents three major trends: first, optimizing market structure to consolidate Hong Kong's position in the primary issuance market and complementing Singapore's secondary market. Second, upgrading product capabilities from simple asset securitization to structured designs such as ABS tranching and revenue rights passthrough. Third, prioritizing digital infrastructure development, accelerating the construction of DID systems, smart contract clearing platforms, and other foundational infrastructure.

For domestic businesses, the priorities are firstly to innovate development models by establishing a standardized process for "domestic asset preparation - offshore financial issuance," secondly to cultivate cross-border structured product design capabilities to gain a competitive advantage, and thirdly to focus on stablecoin and collateral derivative innovation to prevent overseas liquidity suction effects.

Original Article Link

猜你喜歡

Trust Wallet 遭黑客攻擊最大損失達350萬美元

Key Takeaways 最大受害者損失了約350萬美元,該錢包已休眠一年。 第二大損失達140萬美元,該錢包已休眠兩年以上。 黑客共竊取超過600萬美元加密資產,其中超過400萬美元已轉移至CEX。 自托管錢包面臨基礎設施漏洞的潛在風險。 WEEX Crypto News, 26 December 2025 近期,Trust Wallet 發生了一起嚴重的黑客事件,此次事件引發了業界廣泛關注。在這起事件中,Trust Wallet的一個錢包損失了價值高達350萬美元的加密資產,該錢包在此次攻擊前已經休眠了一年多。此外,另一個損失較大的錢包也損失了約140萬美元,在攻擊發生前已經休眠超過兩年。 Trust Wallet…

项目方將40萬美元BDXN代幣注入多個交易所

Key Takeaways 三個BDXN項目方相關的錢包地址向多個交易所存入價值約40萬美元的BDXN代幣。 這些代幣於兩個月前從項目方的錢包轉出。 相關監測由onchainschool.pro 提供。 代幣轉移涉及的地址包括0xD5682dcA35D78c13b5103eB85c46cDCe28508dfB等。 WEEX Crypto News, 26 December 2025 BDXN項目方關聯錢包的最新動向 近期,BDXN項目方的部分地址將價值40萬美元的BDXN代幣注入多家交易所。據onchainschool.pro的監測顯示,與BDXN項目方相關的三個主要錢包在過去三小時內完成這一轉移操作,而這批代幣則早在兩個月前便從項目方錢包中轉出。 監測機構報告及相關地址詳情 這次轉移操作首次由onchainschool.pro監測到,並在ChainCatcher等多家媒體上披露。根據報告的數據,涉及到的三個錢包地址分別是:0xD5682dcA35D78c13b5103eB85c46cDCe28508dfB、0xD0Fc2894Dd2fe427a05980c2E3De8B7A89CB2672以及0xAc245a570A914C84300f24a07eb59425bbdC1B48。這些地址攜帶的代幣價值總計約40萬美元。 轉移代幣的未來意圖及市場影響…

# 龐貝與互聯網:Base 網絡上的 PancakeSwap V3 池中流動性獎勵啟動

Key Takeaways PancakeSwap 透過 Brevis Incentra 在 Base 網絡引入了 12 個 V3 池並開始提供流動性獎勵。 使用者可以在 Optimism 平台上通過 Incentra 添加流動性,不僅獲得交易費用,還能賺取…

代幣 VS 股權,Aave 爭議的來龍去脈

這是 Aave 要面對的問題,更是整個行業要面對的問題

12月26日市場關鍵情報,你錯過了多少?

1. 鏈上資金:本日有 7.8 百萬美元流入 Hyperliquid;5.5 百萬美元流出 Solana 2. 最大漲跌幅:$ISLM、$FTN 3. 熱門新聞:Trust Wallet 將確保所有受影響的用戶都能獲得退款,用戶需盡快完成程序升級

加密聖誕劫:損失超600萬美元,Trust Wallet 擴展錢包遭駭分析

Trust Wallet 瀏覽器擴充功能 2.68 版被發現存在惡意後門,導致用戶資金被盜,總損失超過 600 萬美元。

熱門幣種

最新加密貨幣要聞

閱讀更多