Aave Yield Distribution Dispute, Solana Surpasses Ethereum in Revenue, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Publication Date: December 22, 2025
Author: BlockBeats Editorial Team
Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has shown a concurrent evolution across multiple dimensions. The mainstream topics have focused on the tension between DeFi governance and privacy compliance: the dispute over Aave's yield distribution and the wallet blacklist risk triggered by Tornado Cash, with the community continuing to discuss the boundaries of power and real-world constraints. In terms of ecosystem development, Solana's annual revenue has exceeded Ethereum's for the first time, strengthening its advantage in high throughput usage and productization; in the Perp DEX race, Hyperliquid's price volatility has raised concerns about the resilience of the perpetual contract ecosystem.
I. Mainstream Topics
1. Aave Yield Distribution and Governance Boundary Dispute
The Aave community has recently engaged in intense debate around the yield distribution mechanism and brand ownership.
Stani Kulechov has made it clear that he will vote against a proposal named [ARFC] $AAVE Token Alignment, Phase 1 – Ownership Governance.
In his post, Stani emphasizes that this is not a "veto-like statement" but rather an attempt to initiate a more open discussion to realign Aave's common mission. He recalls that Aave Labs has been advancing around the original vision of ETHLend for the past eight years, aiming to make Aave a key player in the future multi-trillion-dollar global asset infrastructure. He also acknowledges that community doubts about brand ownership, protocol, and DAO relationships are not unfounded and that previous communication has been insufficient and there will be efforts to improve in the future.
However, in terms of specific positions, Stani believes that the direction of this proposal has fundamental issues: it oversimplifies complex legal, brand, and operational structures, which could slow down the progress of core products such as Aave V4, Aave App, Horizon, ultimately disadvantaging the protocol itself, the DAO, and AAVE token holders. He advocates that similar issues should be gradually addressed through multiple rounds of temperature checks and more actionable solutions, rather than through a one-time institutional adjustment.
The community's response has been visibly divided. Some members criticize Stani for having a "double standard" in governance criteria, such as not following a similar cautious process regarding CowSwap's yield distribution issue and even accusing him of "usurping protocol revenue"; while others support his deceleration of the decision-making pace, believing that multi-round discussions are conducive to long-term ecosystem health.
Overall, this controversy once again exposed a long-standing structural tension in DeFi projects: the lack of a clear consensus on the boundary between DAO governance ideals and the actual power of core developers/founders.
2. "Crypto Existentialism": A Retrospective on Empowerment Narratives
Vitalik Buterin recently made a post reexamining the "core philosophy of cryptocurrency" from a more abstract level. He quoted a user's view that "Crypto has always been constructed towards human empowerment."
Vitalik pointed out that "empowerment" is not a unique concept to cryptocurrency. Before Bitcoin and Ethereum, the German Pirate Party had already made information freedom, privacy protection, and power decentralization its core political ideology. He shared an image of the Pirate Party's "Pirate Wheel" model, where values such as "empowerment, transparency, privacy" form a mutually supportive system.
The community's responses further expanded the discussion. Some emphasized that true empowerment must be irreversible, or else it's merely a surface-level commitment. Others traced crypto back to the cypherpunk and early privacy movements, believing that the significance of blockchain lies in providing a sustainable incentive mechanism and a global execution tool for these ideas. Simultaneously, there were more technical or emotional responses, from BlockDAG, privacy tools to meme-style "Dino powerment," continuously broadening the discussion boundaries.
This topic did not reach a unified conclusion but clearly reflects a fact: in the discussions of privacy, decentralization, and individual freedom, the crypto community is still constantly questioning its "meaning of existence," and this philosophical uncertainty is continuously affecting specific technical and institutional choices.
3. Tornado Cash Blacklist Effect: The Realistic Cost of Privacy
The risk of using Tornado Cash has once again attracted attention. User milian warned that once interacting with Tornado Cash, a wallet address could be flagged by hundreds of apps and protocols, thus excluding it from the mainstream on-chain economy.
In the blacklist screenshot he shared, even popular platforms like Hyperliquid were included. This means that while Tornado Cash's anonymity holds up technically, in the real world, it can easily trigger compliance and risk control mechanisms.
The community's reactions to this were notably divided. Some criticized these "decentralized applications" for effectively taking on a regulatory role, questioning the authenticity of the decentralization narrative. Others proposed compromise solutions, such as proving funds are not related to sanctioned entities like North Korea (DPRK) through zero-knowledge proofs (e.g., on 0xbow.io) or simply switching to more thorough privacy coins like Monero.
The discussion quickly escalated to a more fundamental question: Is the blockchain's high transparency a bug or its most important feature? If dusting attacks could trigger blacklisting, do ordinary users also inadvertently bear compliance risks?
This controversy highlights the longstanding conflict between privacy and compliance, making the "blacklist mechanism" in the on-chain economy more concrete and pushing the community to call for more refined, anti-collateral damage privacy infrastructure (such as Arcium and other solutions).
4. Robinhood Accelerates Tokenization: TradFi Officially Enters L2
Robinhood has been found to have newly deployed around 500 tokenized stocks on Arbitrum, bringing its on-chain total number of stocks to 1993. This move is seen as a clear signal of the accelerated convergence of TradFi and DeFi.
According to related data from the Dune dashboard, the speed of expanding from 1000 to 2000 stocks is significantly faster than in previous stages. In community discussions, some have pointed out that the daily average trading volume of the U.S. stock market exceeds $500 billion, and once even a portion of it migrates to the chain, it will bring substantial fee income and ETH burning effects to the Ethereum ecosystem.
The overall sentiment leans towards optimism. Some see it as an early form of the "DeFi/TradFi singularity," believing that the composability and tamper-resistance of blockchain are gradually attracting traditional institutions. Others emphasize that stock tokenization and 24/7 trading mechanisms may significantly boost liquidity and inject new use cases into the Arbitrum ecosystem.
From a more macro perspective, this development is not a singular event but a continuation of the tokenization trend: traditional assets are entering the Ethereum and its L2-based financial infrastructure network at a faster pace.
II. Mainstream Ecosystem Updates
1. Solana's Annual Revenue Surpasses Ethereum for the First Time
In 2025, Solana achieved annual revenue surpassing Ethereum for the first time, seen as a significant milestone in its ecosystem's maturity.
Community-circulated data charts show that year-to-date (YTD) in 2025, Solana's protocol revenue is around $250 million, while Ethereum's is around $140 million. Looking at a longer time frame, Solana's revenue has grown from around $28 million in 2021 to $480 million in 2024; during the same period, Ethereum has dropped from around $510 million in 2021 to $142 million in 2024.
The recent discussion widely interprets this change as Solana's phased success in user adoption, on-chain activity, and DeFi usage frequency. The community sentiment is notably bullish, with many viewpoints suggesting that Solana is ready to facilitate the next round of "normie onboarding" and position itself as the preferred high-performance blockchain.
Overall, this data change strengthens Solana's competitive narrative in fee generation capability and actual network activity, potentially further attracting developers and capital to tilt towards its ecosystem.
2. "Creator ETF": A New Financial Product Imagination on Solana
The Solana community has recently engaged in discussions around "Creator ETFs." This concept refers to researchers or influential figures constructing asset baskets (such as SOL, BTC, ZEC, etc.) and making them tokenized for followers, with creators earning management fees based on AUM.
Related posts quote Akshay BD's perspective, suggesting that this may be a more sustainable evolution path for "creator coins"—no longer solely relying on narratives or sentiment but building trust through verifiable portfolio performance. For instance, the hypothetical "mert ETF" could hold assets like SOL, BTC, ZEC, HYPE, allowing users to test its asset allocation ability by purchasing shares.
On a mechanistic level, such ETFs can achieve share minting, transparent composition, and on-chain settlement through protocols (such as Symmetry.fi), seen as a new tool that combines peer-to-peer investment advice with globally verifiable funds.
The overall community feedback tends to be positive: some see it as a natural extension of the creator economy in DeFi, while others view it as a new go-to-market strategy. Despite ongoing discussions on cross-chain compatibility and asset coverage, the consensus is that Solana's low cost and high throughput provide a tangible foundation for such financial experiments.
3. Perp DEX: HYPE Breaks Below Assistance Fund Cost Base
In the perpetual contract arena, Hyperliquid's native token $HYPE has shown a crucial price signal. Its price recently dropped below the Assistance Fund's average buy-in cost (around $13.24) for the first time in eight months, briefly falling to the $20 range.
Many discussions have likened this situation to the "jelly incident" in April this year: when $HYPE briefly fell below a key cost level and swiftly rebounded, hitting new highs in the following two months. Drawing from this historical experience, the community broadly views the current range as a potential long-term accumulation window, with some users openly stating their intentions to increase positions.
Overall, this round of pullback did not significantly weaken the market's confidence in the Perp DEX track. Instead, it highlighted the psychological effect of the support fund mechanism in stabilizing expectations. Discussions suggest that with macro and liquidity conditions in sync, the perpetual contract ecosystem may still attract new capital inflows.
4. Other: Bitcoin's "Wrench Attack" Shifts from Alert to Norm
In terms of security issues, Bitcoin security researcher Jameson Lopp announced a gradual reduction in the maintenance of the "Bitcoin Wrench Attack" dossier. This dossier has long documented real-world violent incidents against Bitcoin holders (commonly known as the "$5 wrench attack").
Lopp stated that these events have evolved from early "edge cases" to "real-world issues that occur almost every few days," and maintaining them one by one is no longer newsworthy. He has transferred maintenance permissions to @beausecurity and called for community collaboration to update the information, which is still retained on GitHub.
The community's response has been generally rational. On one hand, they acknowledge the long-term educational value of this dossier, while on the other hand, they discuss the distribution differences of attacks in different countries, as well as the importance of personal protection, privacy management, and real-world security.
This change is seen as a signal that the physical security risk of Bitcoin holders is becoming normalized, and the community's focus is shifting from "alerts" to the systematic development of "response and protection tools."
You may also like

How to Evaluate a Curator?

December 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

Base's 2025 Report Card: Revenue Grows 30X, Solidifies L2 Leadership

From Aave to Ether.fi: Who Captured the Most Value in the On-Chain Credit System?

Venture Capital Post-Mortem 2025: Hashrate is King, Narrative is Dead

DeFi Hasn't Collapsed, So Why Has It Lost Its Allure?

Are Those High-Raised 2021 Projects Still Alive?

NIGHT, with a daily trading volume of nearly $10 billion, is actually coming from the "has-been" Cardano?

Aave Community Governance Drama Escalates, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

Where Did $362 Million Go? Hyperliquid Counters FUD in Decentralization Showdown

Key Market Information Discrepancy on December 24th - A Must-See! | Alpha Morning Report

2025 Token Postmortem: 84% Peak at Launch, High-Cap Project Turns into a "Rug Pull" Epicenter?

Polymarket Announces In-House L2, Is Polygon's Ace Up?

2025 Whale Saga: Mansion Kidnapping, Supply Chain Poisoning, and Billions Liquidated

Ether pumps to outsiders, dumps in-house. Can Tom Lee's team still be trusted?

Coinbase Joins Prediction Market, AAVE Governance Dispute - What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has shown strong momentum across multiple dimensions. The mainstream discussion has focused on Coinbase's official entry into the prediction market through the acquisition of The Clearing Company, as well as the intense controversy within the AAVE community regarding token incentives and governance rights.
In terms of ecosystem development, Solana has introduced the innovative Kora fee layer aimed at reducing user transaction costs; meanwhile, the Perp DEX competition has intensified, with the showdown between Hyperliquid and Lighter sparking widespread community discussion on the future of decentralized derivatives.
This week, Coinbase announced the acquisition of The Clearing Company, marking another significant move to deepen its presence in this field after last week's announcement of launching a prediction market on its platform.
The Clearing Company's founder, Toni Gemayel, and the team will join Coinbase to jointly drive the development of the prediction market business.
Coinbase's Product Lead, Shan Aggarwal, stated that the growth of the prediction market is still in its early stages and predicts that 2026 will be the breakout year for this field.
The community has reacted positively to this, generally believing that Coinbase's entry will bring significant traffic and compliance advantages to the prediction market. However, this has also sparked discussions about the industry's competitive landscape.
Jai Bhavnani, Founder of Rivalry, commented that for startups, if their product model proves to be successful, industry giants like Coinbase have ample reason to replicate it.
This serves as a reminder to all entrepreneurs in the crypto space that they must build significant moats to withstand competition pressure from these giants.
Regulated prediction market platform Kalshi launched its research arm, Kalshi Research, this week, aimed at opening its internal data to the academic community and researchers to facilitate exploration of prediction market-related topics.
Its inaugural research report highlights Kalshi's outperformance in predicting inflation compared to Wall Street's traditional models. Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara commented that the power of prediction markets lies in the valuable data they generate, and it is now time to better utilize this data.
Meanwhile, Kalshi announced its support for the BNB Chain (BSC), allowing users to deposit and withdraw BNB and USDT via the BSC network.
This move is seen as a significant step for Kalshi to open its platform to a broader crypto user base, aiming to unlock access to the world's largest prediction market. Furthermore, Kalshi also revealed plans to host the first Prediction Market Summit in 2026 to further drive industry engagement and development.
The AAVE community recently engaged in heated debates around an Aave Improvement Proposal (AIP) titled "AAVE Tokenomics Alignment Phase One - Ownership Governance," aiming to transfer ownership and control of the Aave brand from Aave Labs to Aave DAO.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov publicly stated his intention to vote against the proposal, believing it oversimplifies the complex legal and operational structure, potentially slowing down the development process of core products like Aave V4.
The community's reaction was polarized. Some criticized Stani for adopting a "double standard" in governance and questioned whether his team had siphoned off protocol revenue, while others supported his cautious stance, arguing that significant governance changes require more thorough discussion.
This controversy highlights the tension between the ideal of DAO governance in DeFi projects and the actual power held by core development teams.
Despite governance disputes putting pressure on the AAVE token price, on-chain data shows that Stani Kulechov himself has purchased millions of dollars' worth of AAVE in the past few hours.
Simultaneously, a whale address, 0xDDC4, which had been quiet for 6 months, once again spent 500 ETH (approximately $1.53 million) to purchase 9,629 AAVE tokens. Data indicates that this whale has accumulated nearly 40,000 AAVE over the past year but is currently in an unrealized loss position.
The founder and whale's increased holdings during market volatility were interpreted by some investors as a confidence signal in AAVE's long-term value.
In this week's top article, Morpho Labs' "Curator Explained" detailed the role of "curators" in DeFi.
The article likened curators to asset managers in traditional finance, who design, deploy, and manage on-chain vaults, providing users with a one-click diversified investment portfolio.
Unlike traditional fund managers, DeFi curators execute strategies automatically through non-custodial smart contracts, allowing users to maintain full control of their assets. The article offered a new perspective on the specialization and risk management in the DeFi space.
Another widely circulated article, "Ethereum 2025: From Experiment to Global Infrastructure," provided a comprehensive summary of Ethereum's development over the past year. The article noted that 2025 is a crucial year for Ethereum's transition from an experimental project to global financial infrastructure. Through the Pectra and Fusaka hard forks, Ethereum achieved significant reductions in account abstraction and transaction costs.
Furthermore, the SEC's clarification of Ethereum's "non-securities" nature and the launch of tokenized funds on the Ethereum mainnet by traditional financial giants like JPMorgan marked Ethereum's gaining recognition from mainstream institutions. The article suggested that whether it is the continued growth of DeFi, the thriving L2 ecosystem, or the integration with the AI field, Ethereum's vision as the "world computer" is gradually becoming a reality.
The Solana Foundation engineering team released a fee layer solution called Kora this week.
Kora is a fee relayer and signatory node designed to provide the Solana ecosystem with a more flexible transaction fee payment method. Through Kora, users will be able to achieve gas-free transactions or choose to pay network fees using any stablecoin or SPL token. This innovation is seen as an important step in lowering the barrier of entry for new users and improving Solana network's availability.
Additionally, a deep research report on propAMM (proactive market maker) sparked community interest. The report's data analysis of propAMMs on Solana like HumidiFi indicated that Solana has achieved, or even surpassed, the level of transaction execution quality in traditional finance (TradFi) markets.
For example, on the SOL-USDC trading pair, HumidiFi is able to provide a highly competitive spread for large trades (0.4-1.6 bps), which is already better than the trading slippage of some mid-cap stocks in traditional markets.
Research suggests that propAMM is making the vision of the "Internet Capital Market" a reality, with Solana emerging as the prime venue for all of this to happen.
The competition in the perpetual contract DEX (Perp DEX) space is becoming increasingly heated.
In its latest official article, Hyperliquid has positioned its emerging competitor, Lighter, alongside centralized exchanges like Binance, referring to it as a platform utilizing a centralized sequencer. Hyperliquid emphasizes its transparency advantage of being "fully on-chain, operated by a validator network, and with no hidden state."
The community widely interprets this as Hyperliquid declaring "war" on Lighter. The technical differences between the two platforms have also become a focal point of discussion: Hyperliquid focuses on ultimate on-chain transparency, while Lighter emphasizes achieving "verifiable execution" through zero-knowledge proofs to provide users with a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB)-like trading experience.
This battle over the future direction of decentralized derivatives exchanges is expected to peak in 2026.
Meanwhile, discussions about Lighter's trading fees have surfaced. Some users have pointed out that Lighter charged as much as 81 basis points (0.81%) for a $2 million USD/JPY forex trade, far exceeding the near-zero spreads of traditional forex brokers.
Some argue that Lighter does not follow a B-book model that bets against market makers, instead anchoring its prices to the TradFi market, and the high fees may be related to the current liquidity or market maker balance incentives. Providing a more competitive spread for real-world assets (RWA) in the highly volatile crypto market is a key issue Lighter will need to address in the future.

The Secret Centralization Landscape of Stablecoin Payments: 85% of Transaction Volume Controlled by Top 1000 Wallets

Why Did Market Sentiment Completely Collapse in 2025? Decoding Messari's Ten-Thousand-Word Annual Report
How to Evaluate a Curator?
December 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?
Base's 2025 Report Card: Revenue Grows 30X, Solidifies L2 Leadership
From Aave to Ether.fi: Who Captured the Most Value in the On-Chain Credit System?
Venture Capital Post-Mortem 2025: Hashrate is King, Narrative is Dead
DeFi Hasn't Collapsed, So Why Has It Lost Its Allure?
Popular coins
Latest Crypto News
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:[email protected]
VIP Services:[email protected]