$5 Billion Investment in Bitcoin Reserve, Is Texas Leading the Way in Building a Crypto Utopia?
Original Title: "Is a $5 Billion Investment in Bitcoin Reserve Leading Texas to Build a Crypto Utopia?"
Original Author: Ethan, Odaily Planet Daily
The crypto storm continues to rage over the United States.
On March 7, President Trump signed the executive order "Establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and a U.S. Digital Asset Reserve"; on March 8, the White House Crypto Summit was held, bringing together government officials and crypto industry leaders; on March 9, a new move in Texas reignited the passion of the entire crypto market — the State Senate formally passed Senate Bill 21 (SB 21), creating the first-ever state-level cryptocurrency fund in U.S. history — the Texas Bitcoin Reserve!
This land of the "Wild West" is now transforming into the "State of Digital Gold," committing to investing $5 billion annually in Bitcoin (BTC) and other top cryptocurrencies. This is not just a "small move" within a state, but a compass for crypto policy across the U.S. and even globally. Is Texas really going to gallop and lead the U.S. to the dominant position of Bitcoin? Odaily Planet Daily takes readers on an exploration.
How is Texas navigating the legal and technical maze of Bitcoin Reserve?
Establishing a Bitcoin Reserve is not as simple as buying a Bitcoin hardware wallet. Texas needs to go through a series of legal, regulatory, and technical steps to ensure this "digital treasury" is securely established.
According to the latest news, the SB 21 bill was passed by the Texas Senate on March 6, 2025, with a vote of 25 to 5. This is good news, but hold on, this is just the beginning. For the successful implementation of the bill, several steps need to be completed:
Step One: First, the legislative proposal needs to be drafted by state legislators or relevant committees and submitted to the state legislature. The bill details the specific goals of the Bitcoin Reserve, funding sources, purchase and management methods, and other details. Once the bill is introduced, it is usually assigned to the state legislature's finance or economic development committee for detailed review and may involve public hearings to gather various opinions.
Step Two: Next, the bill must pass through both houses of the state legislature (if the state operates on a bicameral system). First, the state House of Representatives will discuss and vote on the bill. If it obtains a majority approval, it is then submitted to the Senate for further review and voting, although in some states, the process is the opposite. Once both houses pass the bill, it moves to the final approval stage. Readers should note that all mentions of House and Senate within this article refer to the state's House of Representatives and Senate. Normally, state legislation does not require approval from the federal House and Senate. (Note: Texas has now reached this stage!)
Step Three: After the bill has passed both houses of the state legislature, it will be sent to the Governor for signature. If the Governor agrees and signs, the bill officially becomes law, and the state government can proceed with the implementation of the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve. If the Governor vetoes, the legislature can amend or attempt to override the veto with a higher vote threshold (usually a two-thirds majority).
Step Four: Once the bill takes effect, the state government will designate relevant agencies to execute the reserve plan, typically overseen by the State Treasury Department or a dedicated fund management office. They will need to establish specific purchase strategies, select appropriate custody solutions (such as third-party custody or self-custody), and ensure the security of the reserve funds. Meanwhile, the state government needs to establish a transparent regulatory and auditing framework, regularly reporting on the status of the Bitcoin reserve to the public or the legislative body.
If any of the above steps hit a snag, the Bitcoin Reserve Bill will not pass in that state.
Next up, the bill will face vigorous debate in the House (potentially facing opposition questioning Bitcoin's volatility), and ultimately require the Governor's signature to take effect. However, according to the latest public updates, the bill has been reported as "Engrossed," indicating it has been sent to the House for consideration; there is currently no specific public information on the timing of the House vote.
The House vote may take place in the next 2-4 months (roughly between May and July 2025), but it has not been officially confirmed, and the actual timing depends on House committee schedules and priorities. If more specific official timing is announced, it is usually updated on the Texas Legislature website (capitol.texas.gov) or in relevant news.
Additionally, at a technical level, the Texas government plans for the State Comptroller to oversee this fund, protecting the Bitcoin through cold storage (similar to locking gold bars in a vault, offline storage to prevent hacking threats); on the investment side, planning to purchase up to $500 million in Bitcoin annually. The entire process is akin to building a digital version of Fort Knox, complex yet full of potential. Furthermore, Texas plans to mitigate risks from Bitcoin price volatility or threats to public funds through an advisory council and rigorous audits (submitting reports to the legislature every two years).
Why Did Texas Take the Lead?
Firstly, Texas has a strong advantage in terms of economic size and policy environment. Texas is the second-largest economy in the United States, ranking second in GDP nationwide and even making it to the global top ten. The strong economic foundation has led Texas to adopt a relatively open-minded and adventurous attitude towards new things, especially in high-risk, high-reward areas such as cryptocurrency. Furthermore, Texas's long-standing policy of "low regulation, high freedom" has attracted numerous innovative businesses, particularly in the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry. The previous passage of the "HB 4474 Bill" in Texas in 2021 already integrated virtual currency into the commercial law framework, laying a policy foundation for the subsequent crypto industry.
Moreover, Texas's energy resources and industrial structure also provide powerful support for the crypto mining industry. Cryptocurrency mining consumes a staggering amount of electricity, and Texas has abundant wind, solar, and natural gas resources, relatively inexpensive electricity prices, and a high degree of grid independence (the ERCOT system is largely independent), making it highly attractive to mining companies. Many Bitcoin mining enterprises, such as Riot Blockchain, have long been established in Texas. If the "SB 21 Bill" is indeed passed, Texas could even directly invest public funds in cryptocurrency, further enhancing its energy advantage and attracting more players to enter the market.

Riot Blockchain's Bitcoin mining facility in Texas
Thirdly, the political climate and the attitude of the leadership have also played a catalyzing role. The current Texas Governor, Greg Abbott, has always maintained an open attitude towards cryptocurrency and has even publicly expressed support for related legislation. The initiator of the "SB 21 Bill," Senator Charles Schwertner, has also prioritized this bill, with backing from industry organizations such as the Texas Blockchain Council. Everyone shares the same goal of making Texas a "testing ground" for crypto reserves, racing ahead of other states to set rules and capture market share.
Lastly, Texas's culture and history also deserve some credit. The people here have always liked novelty, emphasized independence, and engaging in "counter-mainstream" activities is not uncommon. Moreover, Texas has previously taken a similar path with its gold reserves (Texas Bullion Depository), establishing the first state-level bullion depository in the U.S. in 2015. Now, implementing a Bitcoin reserve is in line with its consistent style.
The outcome of Texas's crypto reserve is still uncertain. If it does succeed, Texas is likely to further distance itself from other states, becoming a "flag-bearer" in the cryptocurrency field. However, there are risks involved, especially considering the volatility of cryptocurrencies. Whether Texas's move is a bold innovation or a pitfall remains to be seen over time.
American Crypto Map: States' (Partial) Wild Adventures in the Cryptocurrency Field
Why Are States Suddenly Interested in Crypto Reserves?
The enthusiasm of U.S. states for cryptocurrency is not unfounded. Over the past few years, the prices of cryptocurrency investment targets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum have skyrocketed, leaving people envious. In 2021, El Salvador directly adopted Bitcoin as legal tender, and in 2024, Trump called for the U.S. to become the "Global Capital of Cryptocurrency" at the Nashville Bitcoin Conference, proposing the establishment of a "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve." All of these have injected a dose of adrenaline into state governments.
In addition to the overall economic environment in the United States—high inflation, the questioning of the U.S. dollar's hegemony, and the growing popularity of decentralized finance—states have begun to consider whether they can innovate with cryptocurrency to attract investment and demonstrate their "avant-garde" nature. Moreover, state governments have always been in fierce competition, and whoever seizes the opportunity first may gain an advantage, whether economically or politically.
"Wild Adventures" in Some States
Texas: The "Cowboy" Leading the Pack
Texas has always made bold moves in the cryptocurrency field. As mentioned earlier, their Senate just passed the SB 21 bill, aiming to establish the "Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" and allowing public funds to directly invest in cryptocurrency.
New Hampshire: Highly Promising
New Hampshire's key move in cryptocurrency reserves is the House Bill 302 (HB302), also known as their "Bitcoin Reserve Act." This bill was proposed by Republican legislator Keith Ammon on January 10, 2025, and received support from some Democratic members, making it a bipartisan small-scale attempt.
Utah: Low-Key but Not Falling Behind
Utah is also working on a Bitcoin reserve, being a member of the "actively supportive" camp. They have a unique feature in their bill: an investment can only be made in cryptocurrencies with a market value exceeding $500 billion, which currently only applies to Bitcoin. Utah's approach is more cautious and may also be an attempt to stimulate technology investment through cryptocurrency (as they already have a bit of a "Silicon Valley branch" vibe).
Arizona: Following Closely
Arizona is also pushing a Bitcoin Reserve Act, with progress just behind Utah. They are moving quickly, perhaps aiming to take the lead in the Southwest region. Arizona's crypto community is already active, and the state government also wants to attract more blockchain companies to settle in. However, the details of their bill have not been fully disclosed yet.
Opposition: Five States Directly Say "No"
Not all states are on board. It is said that five states (Montana, South Dakota, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Wyoming) explicitly oppose the idea of a Bitcoin reserve, primarily focusing on the volatility and fiscal compatibility concerns. After all, state governments don't have money falling from the sky, and they have witnessed cryptocurrency plummeting by 30% overnight. The opposition mainly comes from "red states" (Republican strongholds), which is quite surprising. It was originally thought that Trump's support would bring all red states on board, but the actual situation depends on specific fiscal conditions and voter attitudes.

The current status of the legislative process for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act (Bitcoin reserve fund) actively promoted by various state governments in the United States (yellow indicates support, black indicates opposition)
Conclusion: Who Will Be the Next Bitcoin Reserve Champion?
Texas' Bitcoin reserve fund plan has ignited crypto enthusiasm across America. Who will be next? Here is a bold prediction from the author: New Hampshire is the most promising! This "Live Free or Die" state is known for its crypto-friendly policies, and state legislators have already introduced a similar reserve proposal, with the local community showing a strong enthusiasm for Bitcoin. Another possibility is Utah, with its blockchain innovation and economic strength making it a potential contender.
Of course, the complexity of the cryptocurrency market cannot be ignored. Whether it is the steep price fluctuations or regulatory uncertainties, they could all become stumbling blocks on the road to crypto reserves. If other regions want to follow suit, they not only need to learn from Texas' policy framework but also need to combine with their own economic structure to develop more robust strategies.
Looking ahead, the potential of cryptocurrency goes far beyond reserves. For regions aspiring to delve deep into the digital economy, supporting innovations in areas such as cryptocurrency retail and startup incubation may be the key step to truly unlocking the potential of the Bitcoin market. Who will be the next leader in the Bitcoin market? Let's wait and see!
猜你喜歡
RWA永續產品危機:為什麼GLP模式註定撐不住RWA永續?
第16週鏈上數據:結構性供需失衡加劇,數據揭⽰下⼀輪上漲的堅實藍圖?
Sui Q1進階報告:BTCfi基建崛起、借貸協議爆發與執行分片未來
川普次子的加密生意經
SignalPlus宏觀分析:關稅撕裂的M2敘事與TradFi式FOMO的回歸
懂王簽字後,美國哪些州在「乖乖」推進比特幣戰略儲備法案?
PENGU觸底反彈發拉漲360%,胖企鵝如何靠IP行銷迎第二春?
Arthur Hayes最新訪談:漲勢能否持續?誰能跑贏BTC?選幣邏輯是什麼?
專訪AllianceDAO合夥人qw:Crypto創業家正逃向AI,90%的Crypto+AI都是偽命題
穩定幣爭霸戰:六路新銳殺出,市場格局生變?
深入挖掘杜拜的加密夢:幻覺、資本與去中心化帝國
「年份」效應下的暗潮:加密基金迎來黎明前的沉默
WLFI持倉代幣解析:川普家族的加密投資獲利了嗎?
RTFKT「圖片遺失」事件之後Nike遭500萬美元集體訴訟,NFT的未來將何去何從?
4 月 24 日,有人發現曾經的頂級藍籌 NFT 工作室 RTFKT 旗下項目 CloneX 的圖片數據在各大交易平台上都無法顯示,取而代之的是一條標語“此內容已被限制,以這種方式使用 Cloudflare 的基礎服務違反了服務條款”,此事在社區引起熱議。
而在一天之後的 4 月 25 日其母公司 Nike 便被起訴,以澳大利亞居民 Jagdeep Cheema 為首的 RTFKT NFT 購買者在紐約布魯克林聯邦法院提起的一項擬議集體訴訟中表示,在 Nike 突然關閉了這些業務後給他們帶來了重大損失。曾經被 Nike 收購的最強 NFT 潮流 IP 專案為何淪落至此呢?
這個名字因為與人造物的英文“artifact”發音相似而來,同時這個名字也代表著其品牌理念。一開始只是一個以打造「元宇宙的 Nike」為目標的數位運動品牌,而當時隨著越來越多的傳統品牌選擇與 NFT 項目合作,adidas 與 BAYC、PUNKSComic 的聯動也驅使了 RTFKT 和村上隆聯合發行了 CloneX。
而正是這個契機讓加密圈更熟悉這個品牌,而後真正的 Nike 也收購了這個「元宇宙的 Nike」。高達 40 個以上的聯名項目獨霸榜首,從村上隆到 Jeff Staple,從 RIMOWA 到 Nike,幾乎是最炙手可熱的加密圈中的最頂級潮流 IP 之一,
RRTFKT Studio
RTFKT 聯創 Benoit Pagotto 曾經在接受采訪時談到 RTFKT 與傳統行業巨頭相比有哪些優勢時說道:“我們有他們沒有的資源,也就是我們有他們沒有的文化——加密文化。他們不可能會花大量時間、每一天都去學習這些知識。”而加密 KOL 對此諷刺道,Clone 每一天都去學習這些知識。” Cloudflare「儲存小圖片」和手排的荷蘭拍賺到了 1 億美元的銷售額。
而正當以為在 4 年後這個諷刺得到了應驗,無數 Holder 盯著 OpenSea 和 Blur 上可能自己高的“Yhby Clonep.”曾提到的加密文化,即使專案方「Rug」了,只要「Token」還在就有社區自治的可能性。而連圖片本身都消失後,這套邏輯似乎再難自洽。
這場風暴中幾乎是只有一個團隊成員站了出來承擔責任,Samuel Cardillo 宣稱自 4 月初以來,團隊就將 NFT 都去中心化,因此並未選擇與 Cloudflare 而搞錯,超過了!萬美元的合約的到期日,原定 4 月 30 日到期的合約被提前了好幾天。
而事情發生的當下雖然 RTFKT 被高強度“FUD”,但 Samuel 高強度的對線網友以及解決問題的態度贏得了社區的尊重,被稱為“最後一個站著的人”,與之形成鮮明對比的是許諾已久在 X 上發文的
在 RTFKT“丟失圖像”的後一日 Nike 便被提起集體訴訟,事實上在 Crypto 世界“被 Rug”已經屢見不鮮了,但能夠追回屬於自己的資產的卻寥寥無路,而這次集體訴訟主要有幾兩個指控,一號未揭露相關監管風險,違反了美國的證券法。雖然關於 NFT 是否能判定為證券目前還不明朗,但類似關於 NFT 的消費者獲得賠償的案例在此前確有發生。
此前奧尼爾與其兒子邁爾斯·奧尼爾“Myles O'Neal”共同創立並推廣了基於 Solana 區塊鏈的 Astrals NFT 項目,包含 10,000 個 3D 頭像 NFT 設計 Damien Guien。計畫承諾打造一個虛擬世界「Astralverse」,用戶可透過 NFT 進行社交、遊戲等活動,而歐尼爾以「DJ Diesel」的身份在社群以及社群媒體上推廣計畫。
就如同許多 NFT 專案一樣,Astrals 在 FTX 崩盤後價值暴跌。直至 2023 年 5 月,投資者 Daniel Harper 等人提起集體訴訟,指控奧尼爾推廣未註冊證券“Astrals NFT”違反美國證券法,原告稱奧尼爾的明星效應誘導投資。 2024 年 8 月,佛羅裡達聯邦法官 Federico Moreno 裁定,原告合理指控 Astrals NFT 為證券,且奧尼爾作為賣方透過推廣行為吸引投資。 11 月,歐尼爾同意支付 1,100 萬美元和解金,結束訴訟,其中 290 萬美元用於律師費用,其餘賠償 2022 年 5 月至 2024 年 1 月 15 日購買 Astrals NFT 的投資者。
但一些專業人士認為,與奧尼爾「個人」這類項目方不同。因為 NFT 的法律地位仍不明,此次 Nike 的案例可能並不會由違反證券法作為突破口,也可能不會有 500 萬美元的賠償,但無論如何 Nike 公司很有可能會「付點錢」平息眾怒。
儲存 NFT 資料最糟糕的選擇是在 Cloudflare 或亞馬遜這類中心化的伺服器上。如果一個 NFT 專案的元資料和媒體檔案儲存在一個伺服器上,而創建者停止維護該伺服器,那麼該資料將永遠消失,最終使 NFT 成為白板。因此大部分的 NFT 項目會兼顧圖片品質和營運成本選擇 IPFS 和上文中提到的 Arweave。
大部分的項目方最常用的是 IPFS“InterPlanetary File System”,這是一種基於內容尋址的去中心化儲存協議,IPFS 透過檔案本身產生的雜湊值作為唯一,使用者只需憑藉此一串串連內容,即可任意符號。這種方式讓資料不再依賴單一伺服器,天生具備抗審查、抗故障的特性,像水流一樣在全球節點間自由流動。但缺點也很明顯 IPFS 並不自動保證文件的持久存儲,內容是否存在,取決於是否有節點持續保存。因此,許多專案方需要主動「Pin 釘住」文件,或藉助專業服務,確保資料長期可用。
而 RTFKT 團隊宣稱透過 ArDrive 將圖片資料上傳到 Arweave,這是一個去中心化的檔案儲存網絡,和 IPFS 相比它可以保證檔案儲存的持久性。用戶支付一次性費用來支付 200 年「或更久」的儲存成本。 Arweave 網路中的礦工被激勵使用 AR 代幣來複製和儲存其他礦工很少儲存的資料副本。這確保了檔案不會隨著時間的推移而遺失,不需要原始上傳者的持續維護。
Arweave 在 BlockWeave 的結構中儲存數據,每個新的資料區塊都與前一個區塊相連。礦工必須證明他們有機會接觸到這些隨機選擇的歷史區塊,從而挖出新的區塊並獲得獎勵,這確保了較早的區塊被保留下來。
使用 IPFS 或 Arweave 比依靠中心化儲存要好得多,但它仍然需要指向鏈下。將 NFT 元資料和媒體儲存在與 NFT 相同的鏈上是最抗脆弱的方法,但在鏈上儲存資料的成本很高,因此保持元資料在鏈上而媒體資料在鏈下的 NFT 專案方是比較流行的趨勢,但是對加密文化來說,純鏈上的 NFT 社群是必缺的,他們的社群往往也更加強大。
像 Nouns 和 Loot 這樣的 NFT 項目在 SVG 上的以太坊圖像上很早就實現了以太坊圖像。以 Nouns 為例,專案使用自訂的遊程編碼「RLE」對每個影像部分進行無損壓縮,並將壓縮資料直接儲存在鏈上,透過這種方式無需依賴外部指標「如 IPFS 等」。隨後,這些壓縮資料被解碼為中間格式,並透過鏈上批次字串拼接產生 SVG 矩形集合,最終構成完整的 SVG 影像,再進行 base64 編碼。
儘管相當複雜,並且此類 SVG 的圖像上傳 Azuki 或 CloneX 這類高精度的 NFT 比較不現實,但這並不影響“鏈上”NFT 的魅力,他們往往超過了 NFT 本身,而是代表了某種文化或者社區力量,像是 Nouns DAO 致力於構建身份、社區
而 Loot 的創始人 Dom Hofmann 曾是 Vine 的聯創,他的一個副業中是創建一個基於文本的冒險遊戲,它也叫 Loot。而開發過程中他編寫了一個隨機物品產生器,一個可以返回各種武器、盔甲和配件名稱的軟體,這便是 Loot 的誕生。
在 Loot 專案中,影像以 SVG 格式直接嵌入智能合約,透過 tokenURI 返回,且可以根據鏈上資料動態變化,同樣實現了完全鏈上、動態生成的特性。
他的呈現模式也許十分十分簡單,僅是文字和簡單的圖形,但他背後的意義卻更有深度。 Dom 曾經被問道,為建立一個世界,誰會無償做出多少貢獻呢?他回答「歸根結底,這些只是清單上的項目。這只是人們如何看待它、如何賦予它價值。而價值不一定是一個用美元計量的金額,它可以是許多東西。」如他所說 Loot 概念影響到了 NFT 與 Crypto Game,現在還在活躍的 Smol 背後的 Treasure DAO 便是從這個概念應運而生的。
在此次 RTFKT 事件發生時,社區內出現最多的聲音便是,這件事利好 Ordinals。 Ordinals 被認為不同於大部分以太坊的 NFT,是完全上鍊的。
比特幣上的 Ordinals 協定透過 Taproot 腳本路徑,將圖像、文字等資料直接寫入交易中,將資料「銘刻 Inscription」進「聰 Satoshi」裡,並透過對 Satoshi 單位進行編號,使每一個 Satoshi 都具備獨一無二的身份。透過這種方式讓 Ordinals 的資料完全儲存在比特幣區塊鏈上,不過這同時也帶來了高昂的儲存成本和資料大小受限的問題。
也因為儲存成本的高昂以及儲存資料受限,BTC 的 NFT 生態更加獨具一格,相比於以太坊功能性或 DAO 組織的模式,BTCNFT 中的「生存者」,是依靠更深度的「文化」傳承。不管是前陣子以 0.2 BTC 的超高髮售價發行的 Taproot Wizard 背後傳承的自 2013 年的比特幣社區廣告《Magic Internet Money Wizard》,還是 NodeMonkes 作為第一個原始 10K 比特幣 NFT。
延伸閱讀:《一文解析比特幣 memeNFT,光頭巫師 Taproot Wizard 在致敬和表達什麼? 》
在這個時代還在堅持做 NFT 的專案方幾乎寥寥無幾,而也沒有人知道下個時代 NFT 會變成何種形式。他會是「證券」?所有權證明?亦或獨立的 AI Agent?有別於 Memecoin,只需要合約在鏈上可供交易社群便能「肆意發展」。對非同質化貨幣來說,無論他僅僅是一張圖片 IP 還是功能性「收據」,元資料的所有權都無比重要。這次的事件是個警鐘,不論對專案方或參與者而言皆是如此。